Advance Xp® Male Sling can be an Effective and Safe Treatment for Post-Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence Also in Patients with Prior History of External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Multicentric Experience. (December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Advance Xp® Male Sling can be an Effective and Safe Treatment for Post-Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence Also in Patients with Prior History of External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Multicentric Experience. (December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Advance Xp® Male Sling can be an Effective and Safe Treatment for Post-Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence Also in Patients with Prior History of External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Multicentric Experience
- Authors:
- Li Marzi, Vincenzo
Morselli, Simone
Fusco, Ferdinando
Baldesi, Ramona
Campi, Riccardo
Liaci, Andrea
Gemma, Luca
Morelli, Girolamo
Serni, Sergio - Abstract:
- Background. Post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PPSUI) is one of the major complaints after radical prostatectomy. Transoburator male sling (TMS) placement is indicated in persistent mild to moderate PPSUI. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) might be a negative prognostic factor for TMS outcomes. Study objective was to analyze EBRT impact on TMS outcome. Methods. We retrospectively investigated patients submitted to TMS for PPSUI, with or without previous EBRT, in two tertiary referral centers since 2010. Objective outcome was measured through ICIQ-SF, 1-hour pad test, and pad per die and subjective improvement through PGI-I. Patients were divided according to EBRT to make in-group and between-group comparisons. Results. Patients were 56, 18 (32.1%) had previous EBRT. Median follow-up was 43.0 months (IQR: 22.3–64.0). TMS was placed at mean 18.8 months (SD 4.6) after EBRT. TMS determined a statistically significant reduction of pads, 1-hour pad test, and ICIQ-SF score ( P <.05). Improvement diminished during long-term follow-up. At last follow-up, 12 patients (21.4%) used 1 safety pad, while 15 (26.8%) used 0 pads. Median PGI-I was 2 (IQR 2–3). Recorded complications were 9 (16.1%) and none exceeded Clavien–Dindo grade 2. There were no differences in outcomes, failures, and complications between groups. TMS failures were 6 (10.7%), 2 of whom in the EBRT group. Four of them (7.1%) subsequently placed an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). Conclusion . AdvanceBackground. Post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PPSUI) is one of the major complaints after radical prostatectomy. Transoburator male sling (TMS) placement is indicated in persistent mild to moderate PPSUI. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) might be a negative prognostic factor for TMS outcomes. Study objective was to analyze EBRT impact on TMS outcome. Methods. We retrospectively investigated patients submitted to TMS for PPSUI, with or without previous EBRT, in two tertiary referral centers since 2010. Objective outcome was measured through ICIQ-SF, 1-hour pad test, and pad per die and subjective improvement through PGI-I. Patients were divided according to EBRT to make in-group and between-group comparisons. Results. Patients were 56, 18 (32.1%) had previous EBRT. Median follow-up was 43.0 months (IQR: 22.3–64.0). TMS was placed at mean 18.8 months (SD 4.6) after EBRT. TMS determined a statistically significant reduction of pads, 1-hour pad test, and ICIQ-SF score ( P <.05). Improvement diminished during long-term follow-up. At last follow-up, 12 patients (21.4%) used 1 safety pad, while 15 (26.8%) used 0 pads. Median PGI-I was 2 (IQR 2–3). Recorded complications were 9 (16.1%) and none exceeded Clavien–Dindo grade 2. There were no differences in outcomes, failures, and complications between groups. TMS failures were 6 (10.7%), 2 of whom in the EBRT group. Four of them (7.1%) subsequently placed an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). Conclusion . Advance XP© placement seems effective and safe in well-selected patients complaining with PPSUI, even after EBRT. Surgical outcomes slightly deteriorate over time. Further studies are needed in these patients to assess TMS efficacy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical innovation. Volume 28:Number 6(2021)
- Journal:
- Surgical innovation
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Number 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0028-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 723
- Page End:
- 730
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12
- Subjects:
- urology -- biomedical engineering -- surgical education
Surgery, Operative -- Periodicals
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive -- Periodicals
Diffusion of Innovation -- Periodicals
Chirurgie opératoire -- Périodiques
Chirurgie endoscopique -- Périodiques
Chirurgie laparoscopique -- Périodiques
617.91 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/home/sri ↗
http://sri.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201793 ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1553350621995042 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1553-3506
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18412.xml