Considering Indigenous Research Methodologies: Bicultural Accountability and the Protection of Community Held Knowledge. (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Windchief, Sweeney; Cummins, Jason
• Is Part Of: Qualitative inquiry. Volume 28:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 151
• Page End: 163
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: indigenous epistemologies -- ethnicity and race -- indigenous approaches to knowledge -- Native American studies -- qualitative research -- methodologies -- discourse -- methods of inquiry; Social sciences -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Research -- Periodicals; 300.72
• DOI: 10.1177/10778004211021803
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1077-8004

Abstract

As part of a continuing conversation related to Indigenous methodologies in Western academic contexts, this manuscript includes a summary of the scholarly dialogue by providing background information and situatedness to an exchange that is positioned in the academy and Indigenous community simultaneously. The dialogue thus far includes a keynote presentation and a series of manuscripts that collectively help explain Indigenous research methodologies (IRMs) and delineates important considerations for practitioners and communities who relate to Indigenous research. The authors share where they agree, and where they diverge as well as their rationale for continuing the discourse in an academic forum. The paper concludes with an alternative method for dissemination (a winter count), that reimagines epistemological pluralism and knowledge protection through bicultural accountability. We consider the repatriation of Indigenous knowledge to be paramount in this process.