Histological Analysis of Cartilage Defects Repaired with an Autologous Human Stem Cell Construct 48 Weeks Postimplantation Reveals Structural Details Not Detected by T2-Mapping MRI. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shimomura, Kazunori; Hamada, Hidetoshi; Hart, David A.; Ando, Wataru; Nishii, Takashi; Trattnig, Siegfried; Nehrer, Stefan; Nakamura, Norimasa
• Is Part Of: Cartilage. Volume 13:Number 1(2022)Supplement
• Page Start: 694S
• Page End: 706S
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: cartilage repair -- magnetic resonance imaging -- T2 mapping -- histology -- mesenchymal stem cell -- tissue engineered construct; Cartilage -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1177/1947603521989423
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1947-6035

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of T2-mapping MRI and correlation with histology for the evaluation of tissue repair quality following the first-in-human implantation of an autologous tissue engineered construct. Design: We directly compared the results of T2-mapping MRI of cartilage repair tissue with the histology of a biopsy specimen from the corresponding area at 48 weeks postoperatively in 5 patients who underwent the implantation of a scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct generated from autologous synovial mesenchymal stem cells to repair an isolated cartilage lesion. T2 values and histological scores were compared at each of 2 layers of equally divided halves of the repair tissue (upper and lower zones). Results: Histology showed that the repair tissue in the upper zone was dominated by fibrous tissue and the ratio of hyaline-like matrix increased with the depth of the repair tissue. There were significant differences between upper and lower zones in histological scores. Conversely, there were no detectable statistically significant differences in T2 value detected among zones of the repair tissue, but zonal differences were detected in corresponding healthy cartilage. Accordingly, there were no correlations detected between histological scores and T2 values for each repair cartilage zone. Conclusion: Discrepancies in the findings between T2 mapping and histology suggest that T2 mapping was limited in ability to detect details in the architecture and composition of the repair cartilage.