Open Source Software for Automatic Subregional Assessment of Knee Cartilage Degradation Using Quantitative T2 Relaxometry and Deep Learning. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thomas, Kevin A.; Krzemiński, Dominik; Kidziński, Łukasz; Paul, Rohan; Rubin, Elka B.; Halilaj, Eni; Black, Marianne S.; Chaudhari, Akshay; Gold, Garry E.; Delp, Scott L.
• Is Part Of: Cartilage. Volume 13:Number 1(2022)Supplement
• Page Start: 747S
• Page End: 756S
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: osteoarthritis -- cartilage segmentation -- T2 map MRI -- neural network -- deep learning; Cartilage -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1177/19476035211042406
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1947-6035

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated a fully automated femoral cartilage segmentation model for measuring T2 relaxation values and longitudinal changes using multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We open sourced this model and developed a web app available athttps://kl.stanford.edu into which users can drag and drop images to segment them automatically. Design: We trained a neural network to segment femoral cartilage from MESE MRIs. Cartilage was divided into 12 subregions along medial-lateral, superficial-deep, and anterior-central-posterior boundaries. Subregional T2 values and four-year changes were calculated using a radiologist's segmentations (Reader 1) and the model's segmentations. These were compared using 28 held-out images. A subset of 14 images were also evaluated by a second expert (Reader 2) for comparison. Results: Model segmentations agreed with Reader 1 segmentations with a Dice score of 0.85 ± 0.03. The model's estimated T2 values for individual subregions agreed with those of Reader 1 with an average Spearman correlation of 0.89 and average mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.34 ms. The model's estimated four-year change in T2 for individual subregions agreed with Reader 1 with an average correlation of 0.80 and average MAE of 1.72 ms. The model agreed with Reader 1 at least as closely as Reader 2 agreed with Reader 1 in terms of Dice score (0.85 vs. 0.75) and subregional T2 values. Conclusions: Assessments of cartilage health using our fully automated segmentation model agreed with those of an expert as closely as experts agreed with one another. This has the potential to accelerate osteoarthritis research.