Consent approaches for research into intrapartum complications: a systematic review. (7th June 2011)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Consent approaches for research into intrapartum complications: a systematic review. (7th June 2011)
- Main Title:
- Consent approaches for research into intrapartum complications: a systematic review
- Authors:
- Nasir, S A
Patel, D
Elati, A
Weeks, A
Vernon, G - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To review the consent approaches that researchers have used for trials conducted between the 1950s and 2000s concerning intrapartum complications. Method: The Cochrane Library database was used to access intrapartum trials related to the management of complications during labour. Studies excluded from analysis were abstracts, non-English, non-RCTs, prophylactic studies, repeat publications of a single RCT, unpublished trials and those investigating non-obstetric complications. Results: 138 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seeking consent at the time of complication was the most common approach. It constitutes 58% of the first stage and 41% of the second stage labour trials. In contrast, obtaining consent from total population during early labour was the most common approach in third stage trials (26%). Overall, researchers did not report taking consent in 20% of the first stage trials, 48% in the second stage and 30% in the third stage of labour trials. Between 1950s and 1970s, 100% of studies had no evidence of consent recorded. Consent at the time of complication was the most popular approach in the 1990s (66%). Throughout 2000–2010, 20% of researchers sought consent from the total population during early labour and 18% provided antenatal information and then obtained consent at the time of complication. Conclusion: Over the last three decades, researchers have been getting better at seeking consent by using a variety of different consentAbstract : Objective: To review the consent approaches that researchers have used for trials conducted between the 1950s and 2000s concerning intrapartum complications. Method: The Cochrane Library database was used to access intrapartum trials related to the management of complications during labour. Studies excluded from analysis were abstracts, non-English, non-RCTs, prophylactic studies, repeat publications of a single RCT, unpublished trials and those investigating non-obstetric complications. Results: 138 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seeking consent at the time of complication was the most common approach. It constitutes 58% of the first stage and 41% of the second stage labour trials. In contrast, obtaining consent from total population during early labour was the most common approach in third stage trials (26%). Overall, researchers did not report taking consent in 20% of the first stage trials, 48% in the second stage and 30% in the third stage of labour trials. Between 1950s and 1970s, 100% of studies had no evidence of consent recorded. Consent at the time of complication was the most popular approach in the 1990s (66%). Throughout 2000–2010, 20% of researchers sought consent from the total population during early labour and 18% provided antenatal information and then obtained consent at the time of complication. Conclusion: Over the last three decades, researchers have been getting better at seeking consent by using a variety of different consent approaches. Labouring women should be considered as a special group of subjects, the physical and psychological effects of labour make this group vulnerable. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 96(2011)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Archives of disease in childhood
- Issue:
- Volume 96(2011)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 96, Issue 1 (2011)
- Year:
- 2011
- Volume:
- 96
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2011-0096-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Fa82
- Page End:
- Fa82
- Publication Date:
- 2011-06-07
- Subjects:
- Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Newborn infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Periodicals
618.920105 - Journal URLs:
- http://fn.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/archdischild.2011.300162.26 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-2998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18394.xml