Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies. (August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Viberg Johansson, Jennifer; Shah, Nisha; Haraldsdóttir, Eik; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Coy, Sarah; Kaye, Jane; Mascalzoni, Deborah; Veldwijk, Jorien
• Is Part Of: Technology in society. Volume 66(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-08
• Subjects: Discrete choice experiment -- Attribute development -- Governance of health data -- Preferences; Technology -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 303.483
• DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101625
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-791X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) is a well-established technique to elicit individual preferences, but it has rarely been used to elicit governance preferences for health data sharing. Objectives: The aim of this article was to describe the process of identifying attributes for a DCE study aiming to elicit preferences of citizens in Sweden, Iceland and the UK for governance mechanisms for digitally sharing different kinds of health data in different contexts. Methods: A three-step approach was utilised to inform the attribute and level selection: 1) Attribute identification, 2) Attribute development and 3) Attribute refinement. First, we developed an initial set of potential attributes from a literature review and a workshop with experts. To further develop attributes, focus group discussions with citizens (n = 13), ranking exercises among focus group participants (n = 48) and expert interviews (n = 18) were performed. Thereafter, attributes were refined using group discussion (n = 3) with experts as well as cognitive interviews with citizens (n = 11). Results: The results led to the selection of seven attributes for further development: 1) level of identification, 2) the purpose of data use, 3) type of information, 4) consent, 5) new data user, 6) collector and 7) the oversight of data sharing. Differences were found between countries regarding the order of top three attributes. The process outlined participants' conceptualisation of the chosen attributes, and what we learned for our attribute development phase. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a process for selection of attributes for a (multi-country) DCE involving three stages: Attribute identification, Attribute development and Attribute refinement. This study can contribute to improve the ethical aspects and good practice of this phase in DCE studies. Specifically, it can contribute to the development of governance mechanisms in the digital world, where people's health data are shared for multiple purposes. Highlights: Most important attribute when sharing health data is the purpose of data use. What is most important differ between countries. It is valuable to present arguments for selecting attributes and levels for a DCE.