Linking soil profile N2O concentration with surface flux in a cotton field under drip fertigation. (15th September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Linking soil profile N2O concentration with surface flux in a cotton field under drip fertigation. (15th September 2021)
- Main Title:
- Linking soil profile N2O concentration with surface flux in a cotton field under drip fertigation
- Authors:
- Li, Yanyan
Gao, Xiaopeng
Tenuta, Mario
Gui, Dongwei
Li, Xiangyi
Zeng, Fanjiang - Abstract:
- Abstract: It remains unclear how the source and rate of nitrogen (N) fertilizers affect N2 O concentration and effluxes along the soil profile under the drip-fertigated agricultural system. A plot-based field study was performed in 2017 and 2018 in a cotton field in arid northwestern China, with an objective to elucidate the impact of the applications of conventional urea (Urea), polymer-coated urea (ESN) and stabilized urea (SuperU) at rates of 120 and 240 kg N ha −1 on concentration and efflux of N2 O in the soil profile and its relationship with N2 O surface emissions. The in-situ N2 O concentrations at soil depths of 5, 15, 30 and 60 cm were measured and used to estimate soil profile N2 O effluxes. Estimates of surface N2 O flux using the concentration gradient-based (GM) were compared with those measured using the chamber-based (CM) method. In both years, soil N2 O concentrations at all depths increased in response to basal N application at planting or in-season fertigation events. However, N rate or source did not affect soil N2 O concentrations or effluxes at each depth. Surface emissions of N2 O were mostly associated with that presented in the top layer of 0–15 cm. Surface N2 O efflux determined by GM was poorly or not associated with those of chamber measurements, which was attributed to the low N2 O production restricted by soil moisture condition under the drip-fertigated condition. These results highlight the challenge of applying the enhanced efficiency NAbstract: It remains unclear how the source and rate of nitrogen (N) fertilizers affect N2 O concentration and effluxes along the soil profile under the drip-fertigated agricultural system. A plot-based field study was performed in 2017 and 2018 in a cotton field in arid northwestern China, with an objective to elucidate the impact of the applications of conventional urea (Urea), polymer-coated urea (ESN) and stabilized urea (SuperU) at rates of 120 and 240 kg N ha −1 on concentration and efflux of N2 O in the soil profile and its relationship with N2 O surface emissions. The in-situ N2 O concentrations at soil depths of 5, 15, 30 and 60 cm were measured and used to estimate soil profile N2 O effluxes. Estimates of surface N2 O flux using the concentration gradient-based (GM) were compared with those measured using the chamber-based (CM) method. In both years, soil N2 O concentrations at all depths increased in response to basal N application at planting or in-season fertigation events. However, N rate or source did not affect soil N2 O concentrations or effluxes at each depth. Surface emissions of N2 O were mostly associated with that presented in the top layer of 0–15 cm. Surface N2 O efflux determined by GM was poorly or not associated with those of chamber measurements, which was attributed to the low N2 O production restricted by soil moisture condition under the drip-fertigated condition. These results highlight the challenge of applying the enhanced efficiency N fertilizer products in the drip-fertigated agricultural system. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Soil N2 O effluxes were estimated based on profile N2 O concentrations. N source or rate did not affect soil profile N2 O concentration and efflux. Soil N2 O production in the 0–15 cm layer dominated surface emissions. Gradient-based N2 O effluxes decoupled with chamber measurements. Abstract : Use of enhanced efficiency N fertilizers did not affect N2 O concentration and efflux along the soil profile under the drip-fertigated system. Estimates of N2 O flux based on soil profile N2 O concentration gradients were in the same order of magnitude but higher, compared with measurement of the static chamber. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Environmental pollution. Volume 285(2021)
- Journal:
- Environmental pollution
- Issue:
- Volume 285(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 285, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 285
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0285-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-15
- Subjects:
- Profile N2O concentration -- Drip fertigation -- Enhanced efficiency fertilizers -- Concentration-gradient method -- Nitrification inhibitor
CM chamber-based method -- DCD dicyandiamide -- ECD electron capture detector -- EENF enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilizer -- ESN Environmentally Smart Nitrogen -- GM concentration gradient-based method -- PE polyethylene -- ƩN2O growing season cumulative N2O emissions -- VWC soil volumetric water content -- WFPS soil water-filled pore space
Pollution -- Periodicals
Pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals
Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals
Pollution -- Périodiques
Pollution -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques
Pollution -- Effets physiologiques -- Périodiques
Pollution
Pollution -- Environmental aspects
Periodicals
Electronic journals
363.73 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02697491 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117458 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0269-7491
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3791.539000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18370.xml