FRI0131 The 2010 acr/eular criteria are insufficiently accurate in the early identification of autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: results from the leiden-eac and espoir cohorts. (15th June 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- FRI0131 The 2010 acr/eular criteria are insufficiently accurate in the early identification of autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: results from the leiden-eac and espoir cohorts. (15th June 2017)
- Main Title:
- FRI0131 The 2010 acr/eular criteria are insufficiently accurate in the early identification of autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: results from the leiden-eac and espoir cohorts
- Authors:
- Boeters, D
Gaujoux-Viala, C
Constantin, A
Mil, A van der Helm-van - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The 2010-ACR/EULAR criteria were derived to classify RA earlier in time. Previous studies indeed observed that the 2010-criteria were fulfilled earlier than the 1987-criteria. This study determined whether the 2010-criteria perform equally in the early detection of autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA. Objectives: To compare the performance of the 2010-criteria between autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA within two different early arthritis cohorts. Methods: From the total Leiden-EAC (n=3448) and ESPOIR (n=813) RA-patients who fulfilled the 1987-RA criteria at 1-year but not at presentation were selected (n=515 and n=53, respectively). These RA-patients were studied on the presence of ACPA and RF, and on fulfilling the 2010-criteria at baseline, as 2010-positivity indicated that these RA-patients were earlier identified. Results: In the EAC, 67% of the selected RA-patients did already fulfil the 2010-criteria at baseline. In ESPOIR this was 57%, indeed demonstrating early classification with the 2010-criteria. Among the selected autoantibody-positive RA-patients of the EAC, 85% was identified at baseline already with the 2010-criteria. Within autoantibody-negative RA this was 45% (p<0.001). Similarly within autoantibody-positive RA-patients in ESPOIR 92% was 2010-positive at baseline, whereas this was only 25% within autoantibody-negative RA (p<0.001). Conclusions: The 2010-criteria perform well in the early identificationAbstract : Background: The 2010-ACR/EULAR criteria were derived to classify RA earlier in time. Previous studies indeed observed that the 2010-criteria were fulfilled earlier than the 1987-criteria. This study determined whether the 2010-criteria perform equally in the early detection of autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA. Objectives: To compare the performance of the 2010-criteria between autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA within two different early arthritis cohorts. Methods: From the total Leiden-EAC (n=3448) and ESPOIR (n=813) RA-patients who fulfilled the 1987-RA criteria at 1-year but not at presentation were selected (n=515 and n=53, respectively). These RA-patients were studied on the presence of ACPA and RF, and on fulfilling the 2010-criteria at baseline, as 2010-positivity indicated that these RA-patients were earlier identified. Results: In the EAC, 67% of the selected RA-patients did already fulfil the 2010-criteria at baseline. In ESPOIR this was 57%, indeed demonstrating early classification with the 2010-criteria. Among the selected autoantibody-positive RA-patients of the EAC, 85% was identified at baseline already with the 2010-criteria. Within autoantibody-negative RA this was 45% (p<0.001). Similarly within autoantibody-positive RA-patients in ESPOIR 92% was 2010-positive at baseline, whereas this was only 25% within autoantibody-negative RA (p<0.001). Conclusions: The 2010-criteria perform well in the early identification of autoantibody-positive RA, but autoantibody-negative RA-patients are still frequently missed with these criteria. As it has been demonstrated that early treatment initiation is beneficial for the outcome of ACPA-negative RA as well, other diagnostics are required for the early identification of ACPA-negative RA. Disclosure of Interest: None declared … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 76(2017)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 76(2017)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 76, Issue 2 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 76
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0076-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 530
- Page End:
- 531
- Publication Date:
- 2017-06-15
- Subjects:
- Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.3994 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18377.xml