Differences of expected intervention effects between participant-led and facilitator-led preventive care services in Japan. Issue 2 (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yun, Shan; Takashima, Risa; Yoshida, Kazuki; Sawamura, Daisuke; Inoue, Takao; Sakai, Shinya
• Is Part Of: Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy. Volume 34:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 83
• Page End: 93
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: Participant-led -- facilitator-led -- preventive care -- community-dwelling -- older adults; Occupational therapy -- Periodicals; Medical rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Occupational Therapy -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 615.8515
• DOI: 10.1177/15691861211022986
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1569-1861

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of different management methods on the effectiveness of care preventive programmes for community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This study comprised two facilitator-led (FL) and one participant-led (PL) preventive care classes in Japan. All participants received the intervention for approximately 12 weeks. Functional assessments, occupational dysfunctions, and subjective health were measured before and after the interventions. A two-way mixed design analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was adopted to examine the effect of the interventions, adjusted for previous experiences with preventive care services. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Fourteen participants in the PL group (76.64 ± 6.48 years, 92.9% women) and 29 participants in the FL group (76.55 ± 5.75 years, 75.9% women) were included in the statistical analysis. ANCOVA showed significant group × time interaction effects in the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST), the Timed Up & Go (TUG), occupational deprivation of the Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction Scale, and self-rated health. Simple main effect tests showed that the TUG decreased significantly in the PL group, while occupational deprivation and self-rated health scores improved significantly. In contrast, FTSST scores significantly improved in the FL group. Conclusion: PL-type management may be more appropriate for preventing social isolation and withdrawal, while FL-type management may be more appropriate for preventing physical frailty. Selecting not only adequate programmes but also an appropriate management type that matches the service purpose can help provide more effective care preventive services.