Trauma Computed Tomography in the Modern Era: Not Always Quick and Safe. Issue 10 (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ghafil, Cameron; Matsushima, Kazuhide; Chiba, Hiroto; Wu, Renqing; Shin, Heeseop; Menchine, Michael; Inaba, Kenji
• Is Part Of: American surgeon. Volume 87:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 1690
• Page End: 1695
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: computed tomography -- trauma -- adverse events -- duration; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery -- United States -- Periodicals; 617.0973
• DOI: 10.1177/00031348211061330
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-1348

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography (CT) has emerged as the diagnostic modality of choice in trauma patients. Recent studies suggest its use in hemodynamically unstable patients is safe and potentially lifesaving; however, the incidence of adverse events (AE) during the trauma CT scanning process remains unknown. Study Design: Over a 6-month period at a Level 1 trauma center, data on patients undergoing trauma CT (whole-body CT (WBCT) +/− additional CT studies) were prospectively collected. All patients requiring a trauma team activation (TTA) were included. Adverse events and specific time intervals were recorded from the time of TTA notification to the time of return to the resuscitation bay from the CT suite. Results: Of the 94 consecutive patients included in the study, 47.9% experienced 1 or more AE. Median duration away from the resuscitation bay for all patients was 24 minutes. Patients with AE spent a significantly longer time away from the resuscitation bay and had longer scan times. Vasopressor support and ongoing transfusion requirement at the time of CT scanning were associated with AE. Conclusion: Adverse events of varying clinical significance occur frequently in patients undergoing emergent trauma CT. A standard trauma CT protocol could improve the efficiency and safety of the scanning process.