IL-6 pathway-driven investigation of response to IL-6 receptor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis. Issue 8 (19th August 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Jianmei; Platt, Adam; Upmanyu, Ruchi; Germer, Søren; Lei, Guiyuan; Rabe, Christina; Benayed, Ryma; Kenwright, Andrew; Hemmings, Andrew; Martin, Mitchell; Harari, Olivier
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 3:Issue 8(2013)
• Publication Date: 2013-08-19
• Subjects: Rheumatology -- Immunology; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003199
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To determine whether heterogeneity in interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-6 receptor and other components of the IL-6 signalling pathway/network, at the gene, transcript and protein levels, correlate with disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and with clinical response to tocilizumab. Design: Biomarker samples and clinical data for five phase 3 trials of tocilizumab were analysed using serum (3751 samples), genotype (927 samples) and transcript (217 samples) analyses. Linear regression was then used to assess the association between these markers and either baseline disease activity or treatment response. Results: Higher baseline serum IL-6 levels were significantly associated (p<0.0001) with higher baseline DAS28, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein and Health Assessment Questionnaire in patients whose responses to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD-IR) and to antitumour necrosis factor (aTNF-IR) were inadequate and patients who were naive/responders to methotrexate (MTX). Higher baseline serum IL-6 levels were also significantly associated with better clinical response to tocilizumab (versus placebo) measured by cDAS28 in the pooled DMARD-IR (p<0.0001) and MTX-naive populations (p=0.04). However, the association with treatment response was weak. A threefold difference in baseline IL-6 level corresponded to only a 0.17-unit difference in DAS28 at week 16. IL-6 pathway single nucleotide polymorphisms and RNA levels also were not strongly associated with treatment response. Conclusions: Our analyses illustrate that the biological activity of a disease-associated molecular pathway may impact the benefit of a therapy targeting that pathway. However, the variation in pathway activity, as measured in blood, may not be a strong predictor. These data suggest that the major contribution to variability in clinical responsiveness to therapeutics in RA remains unknown.