An Emergency Preparedness Response to Opioid-Prescribing Enforcement Actions in Maryland, 2018-2019. (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Acharya, Jessica C.; Lyons, B. Casey; Murthy, Vijay; Stanley, Jennifer; Babcock, Carly; Jackson, Kate; Adams, Sherry
• Other Names: Hoots Brooke E. guest-editor.; Wilson Nana guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Public health reports. Volume 136:Number 1(2021)Supplement
• Page Start: 9S
• Page End: 17S
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: opioid -- law enforcement -- surveillance -- preparedness -- emergency response; Public health -- United States -- Periodicals; 614.0973
• DOI: 10.1177/00333549211046110
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-3549

Abstract

Federal and state enforcement authorities have increasingly intervened on the criminal overprescribing of opioids. However, little is known about the health effects these enforcement actions have on patients experiencing disrupted access to prescription opioids or medication-assisted treatment/medication for opioid use disorder. Simultaneously, opioid death rates have increased. In response, the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) has worked to coordinate mitigation strategies with enforcement partners (defined as any federal, state, or local enforcement authority or other governmental investigative authority). One strategy is a standardized protocol to implement emergency response functions, including rapidly identifying health hazards with real-time data access, deploying resources locally, and providing credible messages to partners and the public. From January 2018 through October 2019, MDH used the protocol in response to 12 enforcement actions targeting 34 medical professionals. A total of 9624 patients received Schedule II-V controlled substance prescriptions from affected prescribers under investigation in the 6 months before the respective enforcement action; 9270 (96%) patients were residents of Maryland. Preliminary data indicate fatal overdose events and potential loss of follow-up care among the patient population experiencing disrupted health care as a result of an enforcement action. The success of the strategy hinged on endorsement by leadership; the establishment of federal, state, and local roles and responsibilities; and data sharing. MDH's approach, data sources, and lessons learned may support health departments across the country that are interested in conducting similar activities on the front lines of the opioid crisis.