Matching identifiers in electronic health records: implications for duplicate records and patient safety. Issue 3 (29th January 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McCoy, Allison B; Wright, Adam; Kahn, Michael G; Shapiro, Jason S; Bernstam, Elmer Victor; Sittig, Dean F
• Is Part Of: BMJ quality & safety. Volume 22:Issue 3(2013)
• Page Start: 219
• Page End: 224
• Publication Date: 2013-01-29
• Subjects: Adverse events, epidemiology and detection -- Decision support, clinical -- Information technology; Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Health facilities -- Risk management -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 362.106805
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001419
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-5415

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To quantify the percentage of records with matching identifiers as an indicator for duplicate or potentially duplicate patient records in electronic health records in five different healthcare organisations, describe the patient safety issues that may arise, and present solutions for managing duplicate records or records with matching identifiers. Methods: For each institution, we retrieved deidentified counts of records with an exact match of patient first and last names and dates of birth and determined the number of patient records existing for the top 250 most frequently occurring first and last name pairs. We also identified methods for managing duplicate records or records with matching identifiers, reporting the adoption rate of each across institutions. Results: The occurrence of matching first and last name in two or more individuals ranged from 16.49% to 40.66% of records; inclusion of date of birth reduced the rates to range from 0.16% to 15.47%. The number of records existing for the most frequently occurring name at each site ranged from 41 to 2552. Institutions varied widely in the methods they implemented for preventing, detecting and removing duplicate records, and mitigating resulting errors. Conclusions: The percentage of records having matching patient identifiers is high in several organisations, indicating that the rate of duplicate records or records may also be high. Further efforts are necessary to improve management of duplicate records or records with matching identifiers and minimise the risk for patient harm.