PWE-006 How often is Bowel Cancer Detected from a Positive 3RD Kit in the English Bcsp?. (4th June 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PWE-006 How often is Bowel Cancer Detected from a Positive 3RD Kit in the English Bcsp?. (4th June 2013)
- Main Title:
- PWE-006 How often is Bowel Cancer Detected from a Positive 3RD Kit in the English Bcsp?
- Authors:
- Field, A
Vogler, M
Logan, R F - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: In the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) subjects returning a weak positive kit (1–4 of the 6 windows positive) are invited to do a 2 nd kit and if none of the windows are positive they are invited to complete a 3 rd kit. If any windows are then positive subjects are referred for possible investigation; if no windows are positive subjects are discharged from that screening round. This testing algorithm has been criticised for making the screening process too prolonged thereby producing anxiety and drop-outs and the Scottish BCSP has abandoned asking for a 3 rd kit on the grounds that the yield was negligible. Methods: We have analysed the outcomes from the 3rd kits returned to the Eastern BCSP Hub from subjects invited for screening between 1 Jan 2011 and 31 March 2012. Results: Over this period over 850, 000 subjects aged 60–74 yrs were invited for screening. 4% (20, 021) completed 3 kits and of these 16% (3192) had a positive 3rdkit and were referred for further investigation. Of those investigated (2830) 4.4% (125) were found to have bowel cancer compared with 17.8% (298) with cancer found after a single kit and 8.1% (483) with cancer found after completing 2 kits. A further 7% and 12% completing 3 kits were found to have high and intermediate risk adenomas. The mean time from selection for screening to obtaining a definitive result for those completing 3 kits was 63 days compared to 34 days for those completing a single kit (95% ofAbstract : Introduction: In the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) subjects returning a weak positive kit (1–4 of the 6 windows positive) are invited to do a 2 nd kit and if none of the windows are positive they are invited to complete a 3 rd kit. If any windows are then positive subjects are referred for possible investigation; if no windows are positive subjects are discharged from that screening round. This testing algorithm has been criticised for making the screening process too prolonged thereby producing anxiety and drop-outs and the Scottish BCSP has abandoned asking for a 3 rd kit on the grounds that the yield was negligible. Methods: We have analysed the outcomes from the 3rd kits returned to the Eastern BCSP Hub from subjects invited for screening between 1 Jan 2011 and 31 March 2012. Results: Over this period over 850, 000 subjects aged 60–74 yrs were invited for screening. 4% (20, 021) completed 3 kits and of these 16% (3192) had a positive 3rdkit and were referred for further investigation. Of those investigated (2830) 4.4% (125) were found to have bowel cancer compared with 17.8% (298) with cancer found after a single kit and 8.1% (483) with cancer found after completing 2 kits. A further 7% and 12% completing 3 kits were found to have high and intermediate risk adenomas. The mean time from selection for screening to obtaining a definitive result for those completing 3 kits was 63 days compared to 34 days for those completing a single kit (95% of all subjects returning kits) and 49 days for those completing 2 kits (1% of all subjects returning kits). Conclusion: A significant number (14%, 125/906) of bowel cancers are detected in those completing 3 kits but this is at the cost of having a screening episode prolonged to almost twice that for subjects obtaining a definitive result after one kit. The intended introduction of faecal immunochemical tests to replace guaiac faecal occult blood tests should allow the use of a simpler and shorter testing algorithm. Disclosure of Interest: None Declared. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 62(2013)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 62(2013)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 62, Issue 1 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0062-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A132
- Page End:
- A133
- Publication Date:
- 2013-06-04
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304907.295 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18319.xml