Introduction of a low pressure suction system for day case large volume paracentesis: results from a scottish teaching hospital. (13th March 2011)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reed, E; Stanley, A; Forrest, E; Gillespie, R; Neilson, M; Barclay, S
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 60:(2011)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A245
• Page End: A245
• Publication Date: 2011-03-13
• Subjects: large volume paracentesis -- low pressure suction.; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gut.2011.239301.520
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: In most centres including our own, large volume paracentesis (LVP) has traditionally been performed under free drainage. The authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a low pressure suction system during its introduction to their gastroenterology day ward. Methods: A low pressure suction controller was plugged in to a standard wall suction point, and adjusted to provide 100 mm Hg of suction. Ascites was drained using either a Safe-T-Centesis or Bonanno catheter and collected in a Vacsax suction carousel. As per our local protocol, 20 g of salt poor albumin was given per 3 l of ascites drained. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded every 30 min. The total volume of fluid, duration of drainage and any complications were recorded. Flow rate was then calculated in l/min. Similar data was also collected from patients undergoing free drainage paracentesis, which was used while all nursing staff were familiarised with the suction. Results: 14 patients (9 male, 5 female) with large volume ascites underwent 46 episodes of LVP (29 cases ALD, 11 cases NAFLD, 6 malignant ascites – was albumin given to these malignant patients?). 27 LVPs were performed under suction and 19 under free drainage. Compared to free drainage procedures, suction LVPs took significantly less time (mean duration 233.9±59.1 vs 279.7±61.1 min, p=0.01). Suction LVPs drained similar volumes (10.45±4.1 vs 9.6±3.8 l, NS) and achieved similar mean flow rates (0.048±0.021 vs 0.035±0.014 l/min, NS). One patient undergoing suction LVP developed transient mild abdominal pain that settled spontaneously. No patients in either group experienced significant complications. Conclusion: Low pressure suction paracentesis is significantly faster than free drainage procedures, and can be easily introduced in a day case setting. The benefits to patient and nursing time combined with excellent safety have led the authors to continue low pressure LVP as standard care on their gastroenterology day ward.