An adverse outcome pathway on the disruption of retinoic acid metabolism leading to developmental craniofacial defects. (30th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Menegola, Elena; Veltman, Christina H.J.; Battistoni, Maria; Di Renzo, Francesca; Moretto, Angelo; Metruccio, Francesca; Beronius, Anna; Zilliacus, Johanna; Kyriakopoulou, Katerina; Spyropoulou, Anastasia; Machera, Kyriaki; van der Ven, Leo T.M.; Luijten, Mirjam
• Is Part Of: Toxicology. Volume 458(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06-30
• Subjects: AOP -- Craniofacial defects -- Cyp 26 inhibition -- Conazoles -- Retinoic acid; Toxicology -- Periodicals; Chemicals -- Physiological effect -- Periodicals; 615.9005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152843
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-483X

Abstract

Abstract: Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) is a conceptual framework that links a molecular initiating event (MIE) via intermediate key events (KEs) with adverse effects (adverse outcomes, AO) relevant for risk assessment, through defined KE relationships (KERs). The aim of the present work is to describe a linear AOP, supported by experimental data, for skeletal craniofacial defects as the AO. This AO was selected in view of its relative high incidence in humans and the suspected relation to chemical exposure. We focused on inhibition of CYP26, a retinoic acid (RA) metabolizing enzyme, as MIE, based on robust previously published data. Conazoles were selected as representative stressors. Intermediate KEs are RA disbalance, aberrant HOX gene expression, disrupted specification, migration, and differentiation of neural crest cells, and branchial arch dysmorphology. We described the biological basis of the postulated events and conducted weight of evidence (WoE) assessments. The biological plausibility and the overall empirical evidence were assessed as high and moderate, respectively, the latter taking into consideration the moderate evidence for concordance of dose-response and temporal relationships. Finally, the essentiality assessment of the KEs, considered as high, supported the robustness of the presented AOP. This AOP, which appears of relevance to humans, thus contributes to mechanistic underpinning of selected test methods, thereby supporting their application in integrated new approach test methodologies and strategies and application in a regulatory context.