Evidence for lack of transmission by close contact and surface touch in a restaurant outbreak of COVID-19. Issue 2 (August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Nan; Chen, Xuguang; Jia, Wei; Jin, Tianyi; Xiao, Shenglan; Chen, Wenzhao; Hang, Jian; Ou, Cuiyun; Lei, Hao; Qian, Hua; Su, Boni; Li, Jiansen; Liu, Dongmei; Zhang, Weirong; Xue, Peng; Liu, Jiaping; Weschler, Louise B.; Xie, Jingchao; Li, Yuguo; Kang, Min
• Is Part Of: Journal of infection. Volume 83:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 207
• Page End: 216
• Publication Date: 2021-08
• Subjects: Airborne -- Close contact -- Fomite -- Human behavior -- Covid-19; Infection -- Periodicals; Bacterial Infections -- Periodicals; Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.030
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0163-4453

Abstract

Highlights: Long-range airborne transmission in the restaurant is fully supported. Fomite and close contact routes in the Guangzhou restaurant outbreak are ruled out. Diners and staffs spent 20% of their time on close contact in the restaurant. Diners and staffs spent 90% of their time touching surfaces in the restaurant. Almost no close contact happened between diners from different tables. Abstract: Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily a respiratory disease that has become a global pandemic. Close contact plays an important role in infection spread, while fomite may also be a possible transmission route. Research during the COVID-19 pandemic has identified long-range airborne transmission as one of the important transmission routes although lack solid evidence. Methods: We examined video data related to a restaurant associated COVID-19 outbreak in Guangzhou. We observed more than 40, 000 surface touches and 13, 000 episodes of close contacts in the restaurant during the entire lunch duration. These data allowed us to analyse infection risk via both the fomite and close contact routes. Results: There is no significant correlation between the infection risk via both fomite and close contact routes among those who were not family members of the index case. We can thus rule out virus transmission via fomite contact and interpersonal close contact routes in the Guangzhou restaurant outbreak. The absence of a fomite route agrees with the COVID-19 literature. Conclusions: These results provide indirect evidence for the long-range airborne route dominating SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the restaurant. We note that the restaurant was poorly ventilated, allowing for increasing airborne SARS-CoV-2 concentration.