Acculturation and market integration are associated with greater trust among Tanzanian Maasai pastoralists. (10th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lightner, Aaron D.; Hagen, Edward H.
• Is Part Of: Evolutionary human sciences. Volume 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02-10
• Subjects: prestige bias -- risk -- cultural transmission -- trust -- acculturation -- market integration; Human evoluation -- Periodicals; Social evolution -- Periodicals; 599.938
• DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2021.10
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2513-843X

Abstract

Abstract: Abstract : Acting on socially learned information involves risk, especially when the consequences imply certain costs with uncertain benefits. Current evolutionary theories argue that decision-makers evaluate and respond to this information based on context cues, such as prestige (the prestige bias model ) and/or incentives (the risk and incentives model ). We tested the roles of each in explaining trust using a preregistered vignette-based study involving advice about livestock among Maasai pastoralists. In exploratory analyses, we also investigated how the relevance of each might be influenced by recent cultural and economic changes, such as market integration and shifting cultural values. Our confirmatory analysis failed to support the prestige bias model, and partially supported the risk and incentives model. Exploratory analyses suggested that regional acculturation varied strongly between northern vs. southern areas, divided by a small mountain. Consistent with the idea that trust varies with socially transmitted values and regional differences in market integration, people living near densely populated towns in the southern region were more likely to trust socially learned information about livestock. Higher trust among market-integrated participants might reflect a coordination solution in a region where traditional pastoralism is beset with novel conflicts of interest.