Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure – Comparison of the Two Filling Methods – Simulated Test. Issue 4 (30th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ilczak, Tomasz; Ćwiertnia, Michał; Białoń, Piotr; Szlagor, Michał; Kudłacik, Beata; Rak, Małgorzata; Bialka, Szymon; Ubych, Adam; Stasicki, Arkadiusz; Waksmańska, Wioletta; Bujok, Jan; Mikulska, Monika; Bobiński, Rafał; Kawecki, Marek
• Is Part Of: Prehospital and disaster medicine. Volume 36:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 421
• Page End: 425
• Publication Date: 2021-08-30
• Subjects: cuff pressure -- intubation -- paramedic; Emergency medical services -- Periodicals; Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; Disaster medicine -- Periodicals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X21000406
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-023X

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Tracheal intubation is the optimal method for opening up airways. Performed correctly, it prevents stomach contents from entering the respiratory tract and allows asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to be conducted during sudden cardiac arrest. An important element of correct intubation is proper inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff. Research has shown that when medical personnel use the palpation technique, the cuff is usually inflated incorrectly. This can result in numerous health complications for the patient. Methods: This research was conducted in 2020 on a group of paramedics participating in the 15th International Winter Championship of Medical Rescuers in Bielsko-Biala (Poland). The aim of the research was to assess two methods of inflating the endotracheal tube cuff. Method A involved inflating the cuff using a syringe and assessing the pressure in the control cuff using the palpation technique. Method B involved inflating the cuff using a manometer. During the inflation, both the cuff inflation pressure and the time required to complete the procedure were recorded. Analysis was also conducted on whether completion of certified Advanced Life Support (ALS) and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) training had any influence on the effectiveness of the inflation procedure. Results: The research showed that paramedics using Method B significantly more often inflated the endotracheal tube cuff to the correct pressure than those using Method A. However, when Method B was used, the procedure took longer to conduct. The study also showed that completion of certified ALS or ACLS training did not have a significant influence on proper inflation of the cuff. Those who had completed certified training courses took significantly longer to inflate the endotracheal tube cuff when using Method A. Conclusions: Inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff by use of a syringe, followed by the palpation technique for assessing the inflation of the cuff balloon, is ineffective. Paramedic teams should be equipped with manometers to be used for inflating the endotracheal tube cuff.