Randomised trial of volume controlled versus time cycled, pressure limited ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Issue 3 (1st November 1997)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sinha, Sunil K; Donn, Steven M; Gavey, Jan; McCarty, Moira
• Is Part Of: Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 77:Issue 3(1997)
• Page Start: F202
• Page End: F205
• Publication Date: 1997-11-01
• Subjects: assisted ventilation -- alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient -- mean airway pressure -- respiratory distress syndrome; Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Newborn infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Fetus -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 618.920105
• DOI: 10.1136/fn.77.3.F202
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-2998

Abstract

Abstract : Fifty preterm infants weighing 1200 g or more with clinical and radiographic evidence of respiratory distress syndrome, requiring both mechanical ventilation and exogenous surfactant replacement, were randomly allocated to receive either volume controlled ventilation or time cycled, pressure limited ventilation. Tidal volume delivery in each group was deliberately controlled at 5–8 ml/kg so that the only difference between the two groups was the ventilatory modality, the manner in which tidal volume was delivered. The rest of the ventilatory management and clinical care was done according to protocol. The two modes of ventilation were compared by determining the time required to achieve pre-determined success criteria, based on either the alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient or the mean airway pressure as a standard against which the speed of weaning could be objectively assessed. Infants randomised to volume controlled ventilation met success criteria sooner and had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. These babies also had a significantly lower incidence of intraventricular haemorrhages and abnormal periventricular echodensities on ultrasound scans. Volume controlled ventilation seems to be both safe and effective in this group of patients.