The effectiveness of self-management support interventions for men with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 3 (20th March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The effectiveness of self-management support interventions for men with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 3 (20th March 2015)
- Main Title:
- The effectiveness of self-management support interventions for men with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Galdas, Paul
Fell, Jennifer
Bower, Peter
Kidd, Lisa
Blickem, Christian
McPherson, Kerri
Hunt, Kate
Gilbody, Simon
Richardson, Gerry - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of self-management support interventions in men with long-term conditions. Methods: A quantitative systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched to identify published reviews of self-management support interventions. Relevant reviews were screened to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of self-management support interventions conducted in men alone, or which analysed the effects of interventions by sex. Review methods: Data on relevant outcomes, patient populations, intervention type and study quality were extracted. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of interventions in men, women, and mixed-sex sub-groups. Results: 40 RCTs of self-management support interventions in men, and 20 eligible RCTs where an analysis by sex was reported, were included in the review. Meta-analysis suggested that physical activity, education, and peer support-based interventions have a positive impact on quality of life in men. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to make strong statements about whether self-management support interventions show larger, similar or smaller effects in men compared with women and mixed-sex groups. Conclusions: Clinicians may wish to consider whether certain types of self-management support (eg, physical activity, education, peer support) areAbstract : Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of self-management support interventions in men with long-term conditions. Methods: A quantitative systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched to identify published reviews of self-management support interventions. Relevant reviews were screened to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of self-management support interventions conducted in men alone, or which analysed the effects of interventions by sex. Review methods: Data on relevant outcomes, patient populations, intervention type and study quality were extracted. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of interventions in men, women, and mixed-sex sub-groups. Results: 40 RCTs of self-management support interventions in men, and 20 eligible RCTs where an analysis by sex was reported, were included in the review. Meta-analysis suggested that physical activity, education, and peer support-based interventions have a positive impact on quality of life in men. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to make strong statements about whether self-management support interventions show larger, similar or smaller effects in men compared with women and mixed-sex groups. Conclusions: Clinicians may wish to consider whether certain types of self-management support (eg, physical activity, education, peer support) are particularly effective in men, although more research is needed to fully determine and explore this. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 5:Issue 3(2015)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 5:Issue 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0005-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-20
- Subjects:
- PRIMARY CARE -- PUBLIC HEALTH
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006620 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18299.xml