Informed consent in renal transplantation. Issue 953 (4th March 2005)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Edwards, A G; Weale, A R; Morgan, J D
• Is Part Of: Postgraduate medical journal. Volume 81:Issue 953(2005)
• Page Start: 188
• Page End: 190
• Publication Date: 2005-03-04
• Subjects: consent form -- informed consent -- renal transplantation -- surgery; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.024760
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0032-5473

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: This study was performed to assess how well completed the new consent forms are for patients undergoing renal transplantation. Methodology: 100 patients were randomly selected from the 160 who had a renal transplantation, at a single centre in the UK, over an 18 month period. The notes were located and the consent forms scrutinised. Findings: Seven sets of notes could not be traced and 10 did not contain a relevant consent form. Forty eight per cent of completed forms mentioned the source of organ while 8% mentioned on which side the operation was to be performed. Twelve risks and complications were identified as being relevant to this procedure but no single form mentioned all 12. In most cases a senior member of the surgical team obtained consent. Implications: The demonstrated variability in the amount of detail on consent forms lends weight to the call for the use of procedure specific forms. While such variability does not necessarily equate with not gaining valid, informed consent, this form, at present, serves as the only record of what has been discussed with the patient. These findings should encourage all surgeons to complete the forms themselves, be as detailed as possible, and ensure that the form is filed in the patients' notes.