Prediction of early unplanned intensive care unit readmission in a UK tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional machine learning approach. Issue 9 (15th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Desautels, Thomas; Das, Ritankar; Calvert, Jacob; Trivedi, Monica; Summers, Charlotte; Wales, David J; Ercole, Ari
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 7:Issue 9(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-09-15
• Subjects: unplanned readmission -- prediction -- machine learning; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017199
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Unplanned readmissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) are highly undesirable, increasing variance in care, making resource planning difficult and potentially increasing length of stay and mortality in some settings. Identifying patients who are likely to suffer unplanned ICU readmission could reduce the frequency of this adverse event. Setting: A single academic, tertiary care hospital in the UK. Participants: A set of 3326 ICU episodes collected between October 2014 and August 2016. All records were of patients who visited an ICU at some point during their stay. We excluded patients who were ≤16 years of age; visited ICUs other than the general and neurosciences ICU; were missing crucial electronic patient record measurements; or had indeterminate ICU discharge outcomes or very early or extremely late discharge times. After exclusion, 2018 outcome-labelled episodes remained. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for prediction of unplanned ICU readmission or in-hospital death within 48 hours of first ICU discharge. Results: In 10-fold cross-validation, an ensemble predictor was trained on data from both the target hospital and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database and tested on the target hospital's data. This predictor discriminated between patients with the unplanned ICU readmission or death outcome and those without this outcome, attaining mean AUROC of 0.7095 (SE 0.0260), superior to the purpose-built Stability and Workload Index for Transfer (SWIFT) score (AUROC=0.6082, SE 0.0249; p=0.014, pairwise t-test). Conclusions: Despite the inherent difficulties, we demonstrate that a novel machine learning algorithm based on transfer learning could achieve good discrimination, over and above that of the treating clinicians or the value added by the SWIFT score. Accurate prediction of unplanned readmission could be used to target resources more efficiently.