Harm Perceptions of Tobacco/Nicotine Products and Child Exposure: Differences between Non-Users, Cigarette-Exclusive, and Electronic Cigarette-Exclusive Users. (March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tackett, Alayna P; Wallace, Samantha W; Smith, Caitlin E; Turner, Elise; Fedele, David A; Stepanov, Irina; Lechner, William V; Hale, Jessica J; Wagener, Theodore L
• Is Part Of: Tobacco use insights. Volume 14(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03
• Subjects: Secondhand smoke exposure -- secondhand aerosol exposure -- child health; Nicotine -- Physiological effect -- Periodicals; Nicotine addiction -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Tobacco -- Physiological effect -- Periodicals; Tobacco use -- Health aspects -- Periodicals; Tobacco use -- Periodicals; Tobacco Use; Tobacco Use Disorder -- therapy; Nicotine addiction -- Treatment; Nicotine -- Physiological effect; Tobacco -- Physiological effect; Tobacco use; Tobacco use -- Health aspects; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.865
• DOI: 10.1177/1179173X21998362
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1179-173X

Abstract

Objective: This study examined caregiver perception of harm and child secondhand exposure to nicotine in a sample of e-cigarette-exclusive, cigarette-exclusive, and non-tobacco/nicotine users (non-users). Methods: Cigarette-exclusive (n = 19), e-cigarette-exclusive (n = 12), and non-users (n = 20) and their children (N = 51, Mage = 10.47) completed self-report questionnaires about perceptions of harm, child secondhand exposure, and provided urine to assess child nicotine exposure (cotinine). ANOVAs examined differences between caregiver use status on tobacco harm perceptions and child cotinine levels. Independent samples t -test compared differences in caregiver-reported child secondhand exposure in the home and car. Results: All 3 caregiver groups rated cigarettes as highly harmful ( P = .14), but e-cigarette users rated all 3 types of e-cigarette products (Cartridge-based: P < .001; Tank: P < .001; Box Mod: P < .001) as less harmful than cigarette users and non-users. Caregivers from the e-cigarette user group reported greater child secondhand exposure than caregivers using cigarettes (past 7-day in-home exposure ( P = .03); past 7-day exposure in-home + in-car exposure ( P = .02); in-home exposure by caregivers and other people exposure ( P = .02)). Children from the cigarette user group had significantly higher levels of cotinine ( M = 16.6, SD = 21.7) compared to children from the Non-User group ( M = .43, SD = .95; P = .001), but no significant difference when compared to children from the E-Cigarette User group ( M = 6.5, SD = 13.5). Discussion: In this sample, caregivers who used e-cigarettes perceived them as less harmful, reported using them more frequently at home and in the car, even when their children were present, compared to cigarette users. As a result, children appear to be exposed to nicotine at levels similar to children living with cigarette users. Future caregiver prevention and intervention efforts should target education around the potential harms of secondhand e-cigarette aerosol to children.