Does sustainability activities performance matter during financial crises? Investigating the case of COVID-19. (August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yoo, Sunbin; Keeley, Alexander Ryota; Managi, Shunsuke
• Is Part Of: Energy policy. Volume 155(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-08
• Subjects: Environmental -- Social -- Governance -- COVID-19 -- Stock return -- Reputation; Energy policy -- Periodicals; Politique énergétique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 333.79
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112330
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4215

Abstract

Abstract: As a market for sustainability investing is growing rapidly, understanding the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities on firms' financial performance is becoming increasingly important. In this study, we examine the effect of ESG performance on stock returns and volatility during the financial crisis resulting from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. To quantify the impact, we use company-level daily ESG score data and United Nations Global Compact (GC) score data. In our dataset, ESG scores indicate ESG performance that is deemed important to financial materiality, and the GC score indicates the firm reputation for following UN rules. Our results indicate that during the pandemic, an increase in the ESG score, especially the E score component, is related to higher returns and lower volatility. Conversely, increasing GC scores is correlated with lower stock returns and higher volatility. In addition, we find that firms in lower return groups benefit more than other firms. Focusing on energy sector impacts, we show that although the non-energy sector benefits more than the energy sector from increasing E scores, energy sector firms can still reduce their stock price volatility by increasing these scores. Our study offers significant implications for ESG investment strategies during financial crises. Highlights: We examine the effect of ESG performance on stock returns and volatility during COVID-19. Higher ESG indicates higher return and lower volatility. Firms pursuing higher reputation shows lower returns and higher volatility. Firms in lower return groups benefit more than other firms.