Repetitive Peripheral Sensory Stimulation as an Add-On Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke: A Randomized Trial. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Conforto, Adriana B.; Machado, André G.; Ribeiro, Nathalia H. V.; Plow, Ela B.; Liew, Sook-Lei; da Costa Leite, Claudia; Zavaliangos-Petropulu, Artemis; Menezes, Isabella; dos Anjos, Sarah M.; Luccas, Rafael; Peckham, Paul Hunter; Cohen, Leonardo G.
• Is Part Of: Neurorehabilitation & neural repair. Volume 35:Number 12(2021)
• Page Start: 1059
• Page End: 1064
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: upper extremity -- cerebrovascular accident -- rehabilitation -- sensory -- neuromodulation; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Brain damage -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Spinal cord -- Wounds and injuries -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Regeneration -- Periodicals; Neuroplasticity -- Periodicals; 616.804305
• DOI: 10.1177/15459683211046259
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1545-9683

Abstract

Introduction: Repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation (RPSS) followed by 4-hour task-specific training (TST) improves upper limb motor function in subjects with stroke who experience moderate to severe motor upper limb impairments. Here, we compared effects of RPSS vs sham followed by a shorter duration of training in subjects with moderate to severe motor impairments in the chronic phase after stroke. Methods: This single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial compared effects of 18 sessions of either 1.5 h of active RPSS or sham followed by a supervised session that included 45 min of TST of the paretic upper limb. In both groups, subjects were instructed to perform functional tasks at home, without supervision. The primary outcome measure was the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) after 6 weeks of treatment. Grasp and pinch strength were secondary outcomes. Results: In intention-to-treat analysis, WMFT improved significantly in both active and sham groups at 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. Grasp strength improved significantly in the active, but not in the sham group, at 3 and 6 weeks. Pinch strength improved significantly in both groups at 3 weeks, and only in the active group at 6 weeks. Conclusions: The between-group difference in changes in WMFT was not statistically significant. Despite the short duration of supervised treatment, WMFT improved significantly in subjects treated with RPSS or sham. These findings are relevant to settings that impose constraints in duration of direct contact between therapists and patients. In addition, RPSS led to significant gains in hand strength. Trial Registry Name: Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Motor Training in Stroke Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT0265878https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02658578