Non-conforming FEM-FEM coupling approaches and their application to dynamic structural analysis. (15th August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Non-conforming FEM-FEM coupling approaches and their application to dynamic structural analysis. (15th August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Non-conforming FEM-FEM coupling approaches and their application to dynamic structural analysis
- Authors:
- Wilson, Peter
Teschemacher, Tobias
Bucher, Philipp
Wüchner, Roland - Abstract:
- Highlights: Application of partitioned dynamic structural finite element analysis. Stability and accuracy evaluation of non-conforming FEM-FEM coupling technologies. Comparison of Gauss–Seidel and FETI-based FEM-FEM coupling approaches. Effect of origin/destination designation on FETI-based coupling. Partitioned coupling approaches computationally competitive with monolithic solution. Abstract: Contrasting monolithically solved numerical analyses, partitioned coupled simulations confer the substantial advantages of software modularity, employing the best numerical techniques for each domain and readiness to extend the coupling to other physics and emerging numerical techniques. However, an additional interface problem is created and must be solved without significantly deteriorating solution accuracy. This application-oriented study examines non-conforming partitioned dynamic FEM-FEM simulations under approaches of varying complexity illustrating their ranges of applicability as well as key advantages and disadvantages. After presenting the pertinent aspects of popular coupling technologies, two numerical examples of different complexities are considered. Although the efficiently simple Gauss–Seidel approach is suitable for partitioned systems of dissimilar stiffnesses, such as structure and fluid/soil interaction, stability and accuracy deteriorate as domain compliances align rendering it unsuitable for partitioned structural analysis. Contrasting this, the more robustHighlights: Application of partitioned dynamic structural finite element analysis. Stability and accuracy evaluation of non-conforming FEM-FEM coupling technologies. Comparison of Gauss–Seidel and FETI-based FEM-FEM coupling approaches. Effect of origin/destination designation on FETI-based coupling. Partitioned coupling approaches computationally competitive with monolithic solution. Abstract: Contrasting monolithically solved numerical analyses, partitioned coupled simulations confer the substantial advantages of software modularity, employing the best numerical techniques for each domain and readiness to extend the coupling to other physics and emerging numerical techniques. However, an additional interface problem is created and must be solved without significantly deteriorating solution accuracy. This application-oriented study examines non-conforming partitioned dynamic FEM-FEM simulations under approaches of varying complexity illustrating their ranges of applicability as well as key advantages and disadvantages. After presenting the pertinent aspects of popular coupling technologies, two numerical examples of different complexities are considered. Although the efficiently simple Gauss–Seidel approach is suitable for partitioned systems of dissimilar stiffnesses, such as structure and fluid/soil interaction, stability and accuracy deteriorate as domain compliances align rendering it unsuitable for partitioned structural analysis. Contrasting this, the more robust FETI-based method maintains stability over all stiffness ratios and demonstrates excellent agreement with equivalent monolithic structural responses in terms of displacements and stresses. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Engineering structures. Volume 241(2021)
- Journal:
- Engineering structures
- Issue:
- Volume 241(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 241, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 241
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0241-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08-15
- Subjects:
- Coupled analysis -- Partitioned coupling -- FETI -- Mortar methods
Structural engineering -- Periodicals
Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals
Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques
Génie parasismique -- Périodiques
Pression du vent -- Périodiques
Earthquake engineering
Structural engineering
Wind-pressure
Periodicals
624.105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01410296 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112342 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0141-0296
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3770.032000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18253.xml