Household coverage, quality and costs of care provided by community health worker teams and the determining factors: findings from a mixed methods study in South Africa. Issue 8 (20th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goudge, Jane; de Kadt, Julia; Babalola, Olukemi; Muteba, Michel; Tseng, Yu-hwei; Malatji, Hlologelo; Rwafa, Teurai; Nxumalo, Nonhlanhla; Levin, Jonathan; Thorogood, Margaret; Daviaud, Emmanuelle; Watkins, Jocelyn; Griffiths, Frances
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 10:Issue 8(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08-20
• Subjects: organisation of health services -- quality in health care -- human resource management; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035578
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Community health workers (CHWs) are undertaking more complex tasks as part of the move towards universal health coverage in South Africa. CHW programmes can improve access to care for vulnerable communities, but many such programmes struggle with insufficient supervision. In this paper, we assess coverage (proportion of households visited by a CHW in the past year and month), quality of care and costs of the service provided by CHW teams with differing configurations of supervisors, some based in formal clinics and some in community health posts. Participants: CHW, their supervisors, clinic staff, CHW clients. Methods: We used mixed methods (a random household survey, focus group discussions, interviews and observations of the CHW at work) to examine the performance of six CHW teams in vulnerable communities in Sedibeng, South Africa. Results: A CHW had visited 17% of households in the last year, and we estimated they were conducting one to two visits per day. At household registration visits, the CHW asked half of the questions required. Respondents remembered 20%–25% of the health messages that CHW delivered from a visit in the last month, and half of the respondents took the action recommended by the CHW. Training, supervision and motivation of the CHW, and collaboration with other clinic staff, were better with a senior nurse supervisor. We estimated that if CHW carried out four visits a day, coverage would increase to 30%–90% of households, suggesting that some teams need more CHW, as well as better supervision. Conclusion: Household coverage was low, and the service was limited. Support from the local facility was key to providing a quality service, and a senior supervisor facilitated this collaboration. Greater investment in numbers of CHW, supervisors, training and equipment is required for the potential benefits of the programme to be delivered.