Distance as a barrier to obstetric care among indigenous women in Panama: a cross-sectional study. Issue 3 (4th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Acevedo, Paloma; Martinez, Sebastian; Pinzon, Leonardo; Sanchez-Monin, Emmanuelle; Winters, Solis
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 10:Issue 3(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-03-04
• Subjects: health economics -- international health services -- tropical medicine; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034763
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: We assess the relationship between distance to a woman's assigned health clinic and obstetric care utilisation. Design: We employ a cross-sectional study design using baseline data from the evaluation of a conditional cash transfer programme to promote greater utilisation of maternal and infant health services. Data were collected between December 2016 and January 2017. Setting: The study is conducted in Ngäbe Buglé, the largest of Panama's three indigenous territories, where maternal mortality is three times the national average. Participants: We analyse a representative sample of 1336 indigenous women with a birth in the 12 months prior to the survey. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcomes include obstetric care utilisation measures for prenatal, childbirth and postpartum events. Secondary outcomes include reasons for not receiving prenatal care, alarming symptoms, child weight at birth and stillbirths or miscarriages. Results: Compared with women in closest geographic proximity to a health centre (top quintile, Q1), women who lived farthest from a health centre (bottom quintile, Q5) had significantly lower obstetric care utilisation outcomes for critical prenatal, childbirth and postpartum events. Mothers in Q5 were 36 percentage points less likely to have had at least one prenatal care appointment in a hospital, health centre or clinic compared with mothers in Q1 (p<0.01), and 52 percentage points less likely to attend an institutional first appointment (p<0.01). The gap in institutional delivery and postnatal care between mothers in Q1 and Q5 was about 35 percentage points (p<0.01). All utilisation outcomes were negatively correlated with distance, and differences in obstetric care utilisation persisted even when controlling for household wealth, maternal age and maternal education. Conclusion: Distance is an important barrier to obstetric care utilisation, with women in more distant locations suffering significantly lower use of prenatal, childbirth and postpartum care compared with women in closer vicinity to a health establishment. Expanding the supply of healthcare and implementing demand side incentives to promote the use of health services in remote communities are relevant policies to reduce disparities in obstetric care utilisation. Trial registration number: AEA Registry (RCT ID AEARCTR-0001751).