Strategies and Recommendations for Using a Data‐Driven and Risk‐Based Approach in the Selection of First‐in‐Human Starting Dose: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Assessment. Issue 6 (3rd November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Strategies and Recommendations for Using a Data‐Driven and Risk‐Based Approach in the Selection of First‐in‐Human Starting Dose: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Assessment. Issue 6 (3rd November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Strategies and Recommendations for Using a Data‐Driven and Risk‐Based Approach in the Selection of First‐in‐Human Starting Dose: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Assessment
- Authors:
- Leach, Michael W.
Clarke, David O.
Dudal, Sherri
Han, Chao
Li, Chunze
Yang, Zheng
Brennan, Frank R.
Bailey, Wendy J.
Chen, Yingxue
Deslandes, Antoine
Loberg, Lise I.
Mayawala, Kapil
Rogge, Mark C.
Todd, Marque
Chemuturi, Nagendra V. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Various approaches to first‐in‐human (FIH) starting dose selection for new molecular entities (NMEs) are designed to minimize risk to trial subjects. One approach uses the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), which is a conservative method intended to maximize subject safety and designed primarily for NMEs having high perceived safety risks. However, there is concern that the MABEL approach is being inappropriately used for lower risk molecules with negative impacts on drug development and time to patient access. In addition, ambiguity exists in how MABEL is defined and the methods used to determine it. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development convened a working group to understand current use of MABEL and its impact on FIH starting dose selection, and to make recommendations for FIH dose selection going forward. An industry‐wide survey suggested the achieved or estimated maximum tolerated dose, efficacious dose, or recommended phase II dose was > 100‐fold higher than the MABEL‐based starting dose for approximately one third of NMEs, including trials in patients. A decision tree and key risk factor table were developed to provide a consistent, data driven‐based, and risk‐based approach for selecting FIH starting doses.
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics. Volume 109:Issue 6(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics
- Issue:
- Volume 109:Issue 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0109-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1395
- Page End:
- 1416
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-03
- Subjects:
- Pharmacology -- Periodicals
Therapeutics -- Periodicals
615.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.nature.com/clpt/index.html ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-6535 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.mosby.com/cpt ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00099236 ↗
http://www2.us.elsevierhealth.com/scripts/om.dll/serve?action=searchDB&searchdbfor=home&id=cp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cpt.2009 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9236
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.330000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18245.xml