Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: two-year efficacy and safety findings from AMPLE trial. Issue 1 (20th August 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schiff, Michael; Weinblatt, Michael E; Valente, Robert; van der Heijde, Désirée; Citera, Gustavo; Elegbe, Ayanbola; Maldonado, Michael; Fleischmann, Roy
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 73:Issue 1(2014)
• Page Start: 86
• Page End: 94
• Publication Date: 2013-08-20
• Subjects: Rheumatoid Arthritis -- DMARDs (Biologic) -- Methotrexate; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203843
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To compare over 2 years the safety, efficacy and radiographic outcomes of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab, in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: AMPLE is a phase IIIb, 2-year, randomised, investigator-blinded study with a 1-year primary endpoint. Biologic-naive patients with active RA and an inadequate response to MTX were randomised to 125 mg abatacept weekly or 40 mg adalimumab bi-weekly, both with a stable dose of MTX. Results: Of 646 patients randomised, 79.2% abatacept and 74.7% adalimumab patients completed year 2. At year 2, efficacy outcomes, including radiographic, remained comparable between groups and with year 1 results. The American College Rheumatology 20, 50 and 70 responses at year 2 were 59.7%, 44.7% and 31.1% for abatacept and 60.1%, 46.6% and 29.3% for adalimumab. There were similar rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). More serious infections occurred with adalimumab (3.8% vs 5.8%) including two cases of tuberculosis with adalimumab. There were fewer discontinuations due to AEs (3.8% vs 9.5%), SAEs (1.6% vs 4.9%) and serious infections (0/12 vs 9/19 patients) in the abatacept group. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred less frequently with abatacept (4.1% vs 10.4%). Conclusions: Through 2 years of blinded treatment in this first head-to-head study between biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX, subcutaneous abatacept and adalimumab were similarly efficacious based on clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes. Overall, AE frequency was similar in both groups but there were less discontinuations due to AEs, SAEs, serious infections and fewer local ISRs with abatacept. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00929864.