Improving End of Life Cancer Outcomes Through Development and Implementation of a Spiritual Care Advocate Program. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cipriano-Steffens, Toni; Cursio, John F.; Hlubocky, Fay; Sumner, Marsha; Garnigan-Peters, Deborah; Powell, Judy; Arndt, Nicole; Phillips, Lee; Lassiter, Rev. Herbert; Gilliam, Marie; Petty, Lou Ester; Pastor, Rev. Scott Onque; Malec, Monica; Fitchett, George; Polite, Blase
• Is Part Of: American journal of hospice & palliative care. Volume 38:Number 12(2021)
• Page Start: 1441
• Page End: 1450
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: healthcare disparities -- health equity -- end of life -- aggressive outcomes -- palliative care -- religion -- spirituality -- Blacks -- African Americans; Hospice care -- Periodicals; Palliative treatment -- Periodicals; 362.175
• DOI: 10.1177/1049909121995413
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-9091

Abstract

Background: Explored whether increased support for spiritual concerns between the healthcare team and patients through the provision of a Spiritual Care Advocate (SCA) would improve end of life outcomes in a metastatic cancer population. Design: Newly diagnosed metastatic cancer patients were recruited at the University of Chicago Medical Center and received spiritual support from a Spiritual Care Advocate during chemotherapy treatments. The final sample consisted of 42 patients (58% of those approached) who completed the baseline survey and had known survival status. Measurement: Patients completed pre/post surveys measuring spiritual support and palliative quality of life. Baseline measurements of religious practice and externalizing religious health beliefs were also obtained. Receipt of aggressive EOL care was derived from the electronic medical record. Result: Median age was 61 years, with 48% Black, and predominantly male (62%). Of the 42 patients, 30 (70%) had died by the time of this analysis. Perceived spiritual support from the medical team increased in 47% of those who received non-aggressive EOL care and by 40% in those who received aggressive EOL care (p=0.012). Patient perceptions of spiritual support from the medical community increased from 27% at baseline to 63% (p=0.005) after the SCA intervention. Only 20% of recipients received aggressive treatments at end of life. Conclusion: The SCA model improved the perceived spiritual support between the healthcare team and patients. Although limited by a small sample size, the model was also associated with an improvement in EOL patients' quality of life, spiritual wellbeing, and decreased aggressive EOL care.