Does ACR/EULAR remission mean improved functional ability, quality of life and work productivity?. (22nd February 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Patel, A M; Amity, C L; Frydrych, L M; Jones, D M; Goudeau, D; Eng, H F; Kyle, D; Saul, M.; Solomon, D H; Wisniewski, S R; Moreland, L W; Levesque, M C
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 71(2012)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A16
• Page End: A17
• Publication Date: 2012-02-22
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201230.36
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background/purpose: RA patients meeting the new American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) definition of remission should have better clinical outcomes than those with low disease activity. Therefore, the authors compared functional ability, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), work impairment and medication use between those meeting new ACR/EULAR remission and those in low disease activity or other defined states of remission. Method: Subjects were from the University of Pittsburgh Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparative Effectiveness Research (RACER) registry (n=721). The authors analysed self-administered patient questionnaires (routine assessment of patient index-3 (RAPID3)), short form-12 (SF12), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI)), physician exam data (disease activity score-28 joint count (DAS28) and clinical disease activity index (CDAI)) from a single RACER visit. Subjects were grouped according to whether they met ACR/EULAR remission, DAS28 and CDAI remission, low, moderate and high disease activity. Demographics, questionnaire data and medication use were compared between those who did not fulfil the new remission criteria but did fulfil other remission and low disease activity states using Mann–Whitney U and Pearson χ2 tests. Result: ACR/EULAR remission was achieved by 17.6% of the cohort. Age, sex, race and disease duration were similar between disease activity groups. The mean SF-12 physical and mental component scores (PCS/MCS) for subjects in ACR/EULAR remission were similar to healthy, comparably aged subjects. Subjects in CDAI remission (n=109) also met ACR/EULAR remission and had comparable SF-12, WPAI and RAPID3 scores (data not shown). In contrast, not all subjects in DAS28 remission (n=274) also met the ACR/EULAR definition of remission (n=127). Subjects in DAS28 remission but not ACR/EULAR remission (n=147) and subjects in DAS28 and CDAI low disease activity had worse SF12, WPAI and RAPID3 scores (table 1 ). The use of DMARDs and/or biologics was similar between the remission and low disease activity groups. However, the ACR/EULAR and CDAI remission groups used significantly less opiates and corticosteroids than subjects in DAS remission and all other disease activity groups (p<0.0001). Conclusion: RA subjects in ACR/EULAR remission had a quality of life similar to healthy comparably aged subjects suggesting that the new ACR/EULAR remission criteria represent a true state of remission. The DAS28 definition of remission is not comparable since RA subjects in ACR/EULAR remission had better RAPID3, SF12 and WPAI scores. ACR/EULAR remission was associated with improved functional ability, HRQOL and work productivity compared to DAS28 and CDAI low disease activity. Medication data suggests that for subjects not in remission, achieving remission will require more optimal and/or greater use of combinations of immunosuppressive therapies. Our future goal is to determine the cost-effectiveness and the risk:benefit of more aggressive treatment approaches for patients not yet in remission and to study remission longitudinally.