The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study. Issue 3 (27th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tang, Eugene; Exley, Catherine; Price, Christopher; Stephan, Blossom; Robinson, Louise
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 3(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-03-27
• Subjects: primary care -- stroke medicine -- qualitative research -- dementia; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025586
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Stroke-survivors are at increased risk of future dementia. Assessment to identify those at high risk of developing a disease using predictive scores has been utilised in different areas of medicine. A number of risk assessment scores for dementia have been developed but none has been recommended for use clinically. The aim of this qualitative study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of using a risk assessment tool to predict post-stroke dementia. Design: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. The patients and carers were offered interviews at around 6 (baseline) and 12 (follow-up) months post-stroke; clinicians were interviewed once. Setting: The study was conducted in the North-East of England with stroke patients, family carers and healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care. Participants: Thirty-nine interviews were conducted (17 clinicians and 15 stroke patients and their carers at baseline. Twelve stroke patients and their carers were interviewed at follow-up, some interviews were conducted in pairs). Results: Barriers and facilitators to risk assessment were discussed. For the patients and carers the focus for facilitators were based on the outcomes of risk assessment for example assistance with preparation, diagnosis and for reassurance. For clinicians, facilitators were focused on the process that is, familiarity in primary care, resource availability in secondary care and collaborative care. For barriers, both groups focused on the outcome including for example, the anxiety generated from a potential diagnosis of dementia. For the patients/carers a further barrier included concerns about how it may affect their recovery. For clinicians there were concerns about limited interventions and how it would be different from standard care. Conclusions: Risk assessment for dementia post-stroke presents challenges given the ramifications of a potential diagnosis of dementia. Attention needs to be given to how information is communicated and strategies developed to support the patients and carers if risk assessment is used.