THU0151 Disease Duration and Year of Publication Affect the Results of Studies on Rheumatoid Arthritis Damage Progression by Biologic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (23rd January 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- THU0151 Disease Duration and Year of Publication Affect the Results of Studies on Rheumatoid Arthritis Damage Progression by Biologic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (23rd January 2014)
- Main Title:
- THU0151 Disease Duration and Year of Publication Affect the Results of Studies on Rheumatoid Arthritis Damage Progression by Biologic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Authors:
- Favalli, E. G.
Biggioggero, M.
Pregnolato, F.
Meroni, P. L. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Direct head-to-head comparisons among all available biologic agents for efficacy on damage progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have not been conducted. Objectives: To indirectly compare the 12 months effects of available biologic agents in slowing RA radiographic progression. Methods: A systematic review of literature of randomised, double-blind, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating RA radiographic progression as a primary or secondary endpoint was conducted from Jan 1995 to May 2012. Radiographic progression from baseline, heterogeneity, and effect size (ES [95% CI]) were calculated through a mixed-effect model. Treatment with methotrexate (MTX-experienced or MTX-naïve) before study enrollment and period of study enrolment (PoE) were used as moderators. Results: The PubMed search resulted in 183 references and 14 were eligible for the meta-analysis (the first in 2000, the last in 2011). The analysis of study distribution in ES forest plots showed in both subgroups a high correlation between the study PoE and the impact of biological therapy (figure). In MTX-naïve subgroup, ES was statistically lower for infliximab compared with etanercept (P=0.003), abatacept (P<0.001), rituximab (P=0.001), and golimumab (P=0.023). In the MTX-experienced subgroup, ES was statistically lower for infliximab and etanercept versus abatacept (P<0.001 both) and golimumab (P<0.001 and P=0.018, respectively), and for adalimumab versus abatacept (P<0.001). Image/graph:Abstract : Background: Direct head-to-head comparisons among all available biologic agents for efficacy on damage progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have not been conducted. Objectives: To indirectly compare the 12 months effects of available biologic agents in slowing RA radiographic progression. Methods: A systematic review of literature of randomised, double-blind, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating RA radiographic progression as a primary or secondary endpoint was conducted from Jan 1995 to May 2012. Radiographic progression from baseline, heterogeneity, and effect size (ES [95% CI]) were calculated through a mixed-effect model. Treatment with methotrexate (MTX-experienced or MTX-naïve) before study enrollment and period of study enrolment (PoE) were used as moderators. Results: The PubMed search resulted in 183 references and 14 were eligible for the meta-analysis (the first in 2000, the last in 2011). The analysis of study distribution in ES forest plots showed in both subgroups a high correlation between the study PoE and the impact of biological therapy (figure). In MTX-naïve subgroup, ES was statistically lower for infliximab compared with etanercept (P=0.003), abatacept (P<0.001), rituximab (P=0.001), and golimumab (P=0.023). In the MTX-experienced subgroup, ES was statistically lower for infliximab and etanercept versus abatacept (P<0.001 both) and golimumab (P<0.001 and P=0.018, respectively), and for adalimumab versus abatacept (P<0.001). Image/graph: Conclusions: PoE deeply influences study population propensity to radiographic progression in each trial. This finding does not allow the indirect comparison of various biologic agents, despite our mixed-model significantly reduces heterogeneity among RCTs. References: Rahman MU. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1631–40 Disclosure of Interest: None Declared … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 72:Supplement 3(2013)
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 72:Supplement 3(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 72, Issue 3 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 72
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0072-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- A214
- Page End:
- A214
- Publication Date:
- 2014-01-23
- Subjects:
- Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.679 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18207.xml