P1-S2.17 Modelling the impact of rapid test syphilis screening among female sex workers in China. (10th July 2011)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mitchell, Kate; Cox, Andrew
• Is Part Of: Sexually transmitted infections. Volume 87(2011)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A129
• Page End: A130
• Publication Date: 2011-07-10
• Subjects: Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; HIV infections -- Periodicals; 616.951005
• DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050108.74
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-4973

Abstract

Abstract : Background: In China, female sex workers (FSWs) are hard to reach for public health interventions. STIs and syphilis (Tp) in particular, are now a major public health concern in China. Currently, diagnosis of active Tp requires laboratory tests, which have high sensitivity, are capable of diagnosing active Tp infection, but involve delays between testing and treatment. Such delays lead to a low proportion of FSWs returning for treatment. In contrast, rapid Tp tests can provide instant results, thereby offering the possibility of immediate treatment, but are generally lower sensitivity and cannot differentiate between active and previous Tp infection. In this study, we estimate the impact of using rapid tests to screen FSWs for Tp in a Chinese setting and compare the performance with lab-based diagnosis. Methods: A deterministic model of Tp transmission among FSWs and clients was parameterised and fitted to data from the medium prevalence setting (Kaiyuan City). Random sampling of parameter uncertainty ranges was used to find multiple fits. Model fits were used to explore the epidemiological impact of providing rapid Tp testing and treatment for FSW at different annual coverage levels for 3 years, in comparison to using a high sensitivity lab-based test. Because of evidence for Tp rebounding following treatment, the impact of the intervention after it has ended was evaluated. Results: The model projected the 3-year impact of annually screening 40% or 80% of FSWs with a rapid Tp test (sensitivity 87%) would result in a 46% (43–54%) or 69% (66–77%) relative reduction in Tp prevalence in this setting, respectively. The corresponding decrease in Tp prevalence among clients was estimated to be 2 to 3-fold less but more infections were averted among them. The Asbtract P1-S2.17 figure 1 shows that for a lab-based testing strategy to achieve the same impact as using a rapid test with 87% sensitivity would require a return rate of 92% or 98% if the delay in treatment was 1 or 2 weeks, respectively. After screening ceases, the model projects the percentage of infections averted would continue increasing for a number of years in this setting. Conclusions: In a moderate Tp prevalence setting, a rapid test point of care intervention could have considerable impact on Tp transmission. Unless there is very low sensitivity for the rapid test and a very high return rate for the lab-based method of screening, the rapid test intervention will provide a greater relative reduction in Tp prevalence.