Ongoing training of community health workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review of the literature. Issue 4 (28th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Donovan, James; O'Donovan, Charles; Kuhn, Isla; Sachs, Sonia Ehrlich; Winters, Niall
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 4(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-04-28
• Subjects: global health -- Community Health Worker (CHW) -- lay health worker -- education -- on-going training -- refresher training -- in-service training -- supportive supervision -- low- and middle-income country (LMIC); Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021467
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Understanding the current landscape of ongoing training for community health workers (CHWs) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is important both for organisations responsible for their training, as well as researchers and policy makers. This scoping review explores this under-researched area by mapping the current delivery implementation and evaluation of ongoing training provision for CHWs in LMICs. Design: Systematic scoping review. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, Global Health, Web of Science, Scopus, ASSIA, LILACS, BEI and ERIC. Study selection: Original studies focusing on the provision of ongoing training for CHWs working in a country defined as low income and middle income according to World Bank Group 2012 classification of economies. Results: The scoping review found 35 original studies that met the inclusion criteria. Ongoing training activities for CHWs were described as supervision (n=19), inservice or refresher training (n=13) or a mixture of both (n=3). Although the majority of studies emphasised the importance of providing ongoing training, several studies reported no impact of ongoing training on performance indicators. The majority of ongoing training was delivered inperson; however, four studies reported the use of mobile technologies to support training delivery. The outcomes from ongoing training activities were measured and reported in different ways, including changes in behaviour, attitudes and practice measured in a quantitative manner (n=16), knowledge and skills (n=6), qualitative assessments (n=5) or a mixed methods approach combining one of the aforementioned modalities (n=8). Conclusions: This scoping review highlights the diverse range of ongoing training for CHWs in LMICs. Given the expansion of CHW programmes globally, more attention should be given to the design, delivery, monitoring and sustainability of ongoing training from a health systems strengthening perspective.