A new stratified risk assessment tool for whiplash injuries developed from a prospective observational study. Issue 1 (30th January 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A new stratified risk assessment tool for whiplash injuries developed from a prospective observational study. Issue 1 (30th January 2013)
- Main Title:
- A new stratified risk assessment tool for whiplash injuries developed from a prospective observational study
- Authors:
- Kasch, Helge
Kongsted, Alice
Qerama, Erisela
Bach, Flemming W
Bendix, Tom
Jensen, Troels Staehelin - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: An initial stratification of acute whiplash patients into seven risk-strata in relation to 1-year work disability as primary outcome is presented. Design: The design was an observational prospective study of risk factors embedded in a randomised controlled study. Setting: Acute whiplash patients from units, general practitioners in four Danish counties were referred to two research centres. Participants: During a 2-year inclusion period, acute consecutive whiplash-injured (age 18–70 years, rear-end or frontal-end car accident and WAD (whiplash-associated disorders) grades I–III, symptoms within 72 h, examination prior to 10 days postinjury, capable of written/spoken Danish, without other injuries/fractures, pre-existing significant somatic/psychiatric disorder, drug/alcohol abuse and previous significant pain/headache). 688 (438 women and 250 men) participants were interviewed and examined by a study nurse after 5 days; 605 were completed after 1 year. A risk score which included items of initial neck pain/headache intensity, a number of non-painful complaints and active neck mobility was applied. The primary outcome parameter was 1-year work disability. Results: The risk score and number of sick-listing days were related (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0.0001). In stratum 1, less than 4%, but in stratum 7, 68% were work-disabled after 1 year. Early work assessment (p<0.0001), impact of the event questionnaire (p<0.0006), psychophysical pain measures being McGillAbstract : Objectives: An initial stratification of acute whiplash patients into seven risk-strata in relation to 1-year work disability as primary outcome is presented. Design: The design was an observational prospective study of risk factors embedded in a randomised controlled study. Setting: Acute whiplash patients from units, general practitioners in four Danish counties were referred to two research centres. Participants: During a 2-year inclusion period, acute consecutive whiplash-injured (age 18–70 years, rear-end or frontal-end car accident and WAD (whiplash-associated disorders) grades I–III, symptoms within 72 h, examination prior to 10 days postinjury, capable of written/spoken Danish, without other injuries/fractures, pre-existing significant somatic/psychiatric disorder, drug/alcohol abuse and previous significant pain/headache). 688 (438 women and 250 men) participants were interviewed and examined by a study nurse after 5 days; 605 were completed after 1 year. A risk score which included items of initial neck pain/headache intensity, a number of non-painful complaints and active neck mobility was applied. The primary outcome parameter was 1-year work disability. Results: The risk score and number of sick-listing days were related (Kruskal-Wallis, p<0.0001). In stratum 1, less than 4%, but in stratum 7, 68% were work-disabled after 1 year. Early work assessment (p<0.0001), impact of the event questionnaire (p<0.0006), psychophysical pain measures being McGill pain questionnaire parameters (p<0.0001), pressure pain algometry (p<0.0001) and palpation (p<0.0001) showed a significant relationship with risk stratification. Analysis: Findings confirm previous studies reporting intense neck pain/headache and distress as predictors for work disability after whiplash. Neck-mobility was a strong predictor in this study; however, it was a more inconsistent predictor in other studies. Conclusions: Application of the risk assessment score and use of the risk strata system may be beneficial in future studies and may be considered as a valuable tool to assess return-to-work following injuries; however, further studies are needed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 3:Issue 1(2013)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 3:Issue 1(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 1 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0003-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2013-01-30
- Subjects:
- Trauma Management -- Accident & Emergency Medicine
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002050 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18131.xml