What do pharmaceutical industry professionals in Europe believe about involving patients and the public in research and development of medicines? A qualitative interview study. Issue 1 (7th January 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- What do pharmaceutical industry professionals in Europe believe about involving patients and the public in research and development of medicines? A qualitative interview study. Issue 1 (7th January 2016)
- Main Title:
- What do pharmaceutical industry professionals in Europe believe about involving patients and the public in research and development of medicines? A qualitative interview study
- Authors:
- Parsons, Suzanne
Starling, Bella
Mullan-Jensen, Christine
Tham, Su-Gwan
Warner, Kay
Wever, Kim - Other Names:
- Dack Kate author non-byline.
Lewis Celine author non-byline.
Uhlenhopp Mary author non-byline.
Dillon Anne Marie author non-byline.
Hardman Mike author non-byline.
Haake Barbara author non-byline. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To explore European-based pharmaceutical industry professionals' beliefs about patient and public involvement (PPI) in medicines research and development (R&D). Setting: Pharmaceutical companies in the UK, Poland and Spain. Participants: 21 pharmaceutical industry professionals, four based in the UK, five with pan-European roles, four based in Spain and eight based in Poland. Method: Qualitative interview study (telephone and face-to-face, semistructured interviews). All interviews were audio taped, translated (where appropriate) and transcribed for analysis using the Framework approach. Results: 21 pharmaceutical industry professionals participated. Key themes were: beliefs about (1) whether patients and the public should be involved in medicines R&D; (2) the barriers and facilitators to PPI in medicines R&D and (3) how the current relationships between the pharmaceutical industry, patient organisations and patients influence PPI in medicines R&D. Conclusions: Although interviewees appeared positive about PPI, many were uncertain about when, how and which patients to involve. Patients and the public's lack of knowledge and interest in medicines R&D, and the pharmaceutical industry's lack of knowledge, interest and receptivity to PPI were believed to be key challenges to increasing PPI. Interviewees also believed that relationships between the pharmaceutical industry, patient organisations, patients and the public needed to change to facilitate PPI inAbstract : Objectives: To explore European-based pharmaceutical industry professionals' beliefs about patient and public involvement (PPI) in medicines research and development (R&D). Setting: Pharmaceutical companies in the UK, Poland and Spain. Participants: 21 pharmaceutical industry professionals, four based in the UK, five with pan-European roles, four based in Spain and eight based in Poland. Method: Qualitative interview study (telephone and face-to-face, semistructured interviews). All interviews were audio taped, translated (where appropriate) and transcribed for analysis using the Framework approach. Results: 21 pharmaceutical industry professionals participated. Key themes were: beliefs about (1) whether patients and the public should be involved in medicines R&D; (2) the barriers and facilitators to PPI in medicines R&D and (3) how the current relationships between the pharmaceutical industry, patient organisations and patients influence PPI in medicines R&D. Conclusions: Although interviewees appeared positive about PPI, many were uncertain about when, how and which patients to involve. Patients and the public's lack of knowledge and interest in medicines R&D, and the pharmaceutical industry's lack of knowledge, interest and receptivity to PPI were believed to be key challenges to increasing PPI. Interviewees also believed that relationships between the pharmaceutical industry, patient organisations, patients and the public needed to change to facilitate PPI in medicines R&D. Existing pharmaceutical industry codes of practice and negative media reporting of the pharmaceutical industry were also seen as negative influences on these relationships. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 6:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 6:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 6, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0006-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-01-07
- Subjects:
- QUALITATIVE RESEARCH -- SOCIAL MEDICINE -- PUBLIC HEALTH
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008928 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18151.xml