Limited macular translocation with scleral retraction suture. Issue 4 (1st April 2002)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sullivan, P; Filsecker, L; Sears, J
• Is Part Of: British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 86:Issue 4(2002)
• Page Start: 434
• Page End: 439
• Publication Date: 2002-04-01
• Subjects: macular translocation -- scleral retraction suture; AMD, age related macular degeneration -- CNV, choroidal neovascular membrane -- ICG, indocyanine green -- IVFA, intravenous fluorescein angiography -- LMT, limited macular translocations -- PBS, phosphate buffered saline -- PDT, photodynamic therapy -- PVR, proliferative vitreoretinopathy; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.4.434
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1161

Abstract

Abstract : Background/aims: Macular translocation with scleral imbrication is a new technique for treating subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes (CNV). This procedure shortens the sclera but may result in a minimal decrease in the internal circumference of the globe and limits the amount of foveal displacement. The authors propose a new scleral retraction suture aimed at decreasing the internal circumference of the globe in an effort to increase foveal displacement. Methods: Using a cadaver model, they compared the amount of scleral shortening using a standard scleral imbrication technique and a modified three suture scleral retraction technique. Sections of the globes were digitised and specialised software was used to estimate the amount of scleral shortening. Three patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation underwent limited macular translocation using pars plana vitrectomy and macular detachment with the modified scleral suture technique. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, foveal displacement, and complications. Results: In the cadaver model, the scleral retraction suture resulted in a flatter internal scleral fold compared to the standard suture technique and created approximately 890 μm of effective scleral shortening. In the patients who underwent macular translocation and laser photocoagulation of the CNV, visual acuity improved in two patients and worsened in one patient. The range of foveal displacement was 1400–2400 μm. Conclusion: The foveal displacements achieved in this limited study compared to median displacement previously published using standard suture techniques demonstrates that the scleral retraction suture technique may be a useful adjunct to limited macular translocation. The advantage of this type of suture in conjunction with translocation may depend on the effective scleral shortening offered by this retraction suture.