Access to intensive care unit beds for neurosurgery patients: a qualitative case study. Issue 9 (21st August 2003)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martin, D K; Singer, P A; Bernstein, M
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. Volume 74:Issue 9(2003)
• Page Start: 1299
• Page End: 1303
• Publication Date: 2003-08-21
• Subjects: priority setting -- critical care -- neurosurgery; Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1299
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3050

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the process used to decide which patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at a hospital with special focus on access for neurosurgery patients, and evaluate it using "accountability for reasonableness". Methods: Qualitative case study methodology was used. Data were collected from documents, interviews with key informants, and observations. The data were subjected to thematic analysis and evaluated using the four conditions of "accountability for reasonableness" (relevance, publicity, appeals, enforcement) to identify good practices and opportunities for improvement. Results: ICU admissions were based on the referring physician's assessment of the medical need of the patient for an ICU bed. Non-medical criteria (for example, family wishes) also influenced admission decisions. Although there was an ICU bed allocation policy, patient need always superceded the bed allocation policy. ICU admission guidelines were not used. Admission decisions and reasons were disseminated to the ICU charge nurse, the bed coordinator, the ICU resident, the intensivist, and the requesting physician/surgeon by word of mouth and by written documentation in the patient's chart, but not to the patient or family. Appeals occurred informally, through negotiations between clinicians. Enforcement of relevance, publicity, and appeals was felt to be either non-existent or deficient. Conclusions: Conducting a case study of priority setting decisions for patients requiring ICU beds, with a special focus on neurosurgical patients, and applying the ethical framework "accountability for reasonableness" can help critical care units improve the fairness of their priority setting.