Comparative outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 with mild-to-moderate severity: A retrospective observational study. Issue 1 (January 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 with mild-to-moderate severity: A retrospective observational study. Issue 1 (January 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comparative outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 with mild-to-moderate severity: A retrospective observational study
- Authors:
- Lee, Jeong Eun
Lee, Soon Ok
Heo, Jeonghun
Kim, Dong Wan
Park, Mi Ran
Son, Hyunjin
Kim, Dongkeun
Kim, Kye-Hyung
Lee, Shinwon
Lee, Sun Hee - Abstract:
- Background: Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are both being used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but their relative effectiveness is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated for COVID-19 with LPV/r or HCQ. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at 2 hospitals in Busan, South Korea, where approximately 90% of COVID-19 patients were hospitalised during February/March 2020. All patients aged ≥15 years that were hospitalised with mild or moderately severe COVID-19 received LPV/r or HCQ as their initial treatment and were included in the analysis. Results: Among the 72 patients with mild-to-moderate disease severity on admission, 45 received LPV/r and 27 received HCQ as their initial therapy. A higher proportion of the LPV/r group had pneumonia on admission (LPV/r, 49% vs HCQ, 15%), but there were no other significant differences in the demographic or clinical characteristics between groups. Switching therapy due to clinical failure was significantly more common in the HCQ group than in the LPV/r group (41% [11/27] and 2% [1/45], respectively, P = .001). Disease progression was also significantly more common in the HCQ group than in the LPV/r group (44% [12/27] and 18% [8/45], respectively, P = .030). Conclusion: Based on our study results, HCQ shows no apparent advantage compared to LPV/r for preventing progression to severe disease in patients with COVID-19.
- Is Part Of:
- Antiviral therapy. Volume 26:Issue 1/2(2021)
- Journal:
- Antiviral therapy
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 1/2(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 1/2 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 1/2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0026-NaN-0000
- Page Start:
- 34
- Page End:
- 42
- Publication Date:
- 2021-01
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- lopinavir/ritonavir -- hydroxychloroquine
Antiviral agents -- Periodicals
Antiviral Agents -- therapeutic use
Virus Diseases -- therapy
Viruses -- drug effects
Antiviral agents
Periodical
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.9106 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.intmedpress.com/General/showSectionSub.cfm?SectionID=2&SectionSubID=1&SectionSubSubID=1 ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/13596535211039394 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-6535
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18140.xml