General practitioners providing non-urgent care in emergency department: a natural experiment. Issue 5 (10th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Uthman, Olalekan A; Walker, Clare; Lahiri, Sudakshina; Jenkinson, David; Adekanmbi, Victor; Robertson, Wendy; Clarke, Aileen
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 5(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-05-10
• Subjects: general practitioners -- four hour delay -- propensity score -- natural experiment; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019736
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To examine whether care provided by general practitioners (GPs) to non-urgent patients in the emergency department differs significantly from care provided by usual accident and emergency (A&E) staff in terms of process outcomes and A&E clinical quality indicators. Design: Propensity score matched cohort study. Setting: GPs in A&E colocated within the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust between May 2015 and March 2016. Participants: Non-urgent attendances visits to the A&E department. Main outcomes: Process outcomes (any investigation, any blood investigation, any radiological investigation, any intervention, admission and referrals) and A&E clinical indicators (spent 4 hours plus, left without being seen and 7-day reattendance). Results: A total of 5426 patients seen by GPs in A&E were matched with 10 852 patients seen by emergency physicians (ratio 1:2). Compared with standard care in A&E, GPs in A&E significantly: admitted fewer patients (risk ratio (RR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.31), referred fewer patients to other specialists (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.40), ordered fewer radiological investigations (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.42), ordered fewer blood tests (0.57, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.61) and ordered fewer investigations (0.93, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.96). However, they intervened more, offered more primary care follow-up (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.67 to 1.89) and referred more patients to outpatient and other A&E clinics (RR 2.29, 95% CI 2.10 to 2.49). Patients seen by GPs in A&E were on average less likely to spend 4 hours plus in A&E (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.45) compared with standard care in A&E. There was no difference in reattendance after 7 days (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.09). Conclusion: GPs in A&E tended to manage self-reporting minor cases with fewer resources than standard care in A&E, without increasing reattendance rates.