Visual assessment of Ki67 using a 5-grade scale (Eye-5) is easy and practical to classify breast cancer subtypes with high reproducibility. Issue 5 (11th February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hida, Akira I; Bando, Kenji; Sugita, Atsuro; Maeda, Toshiharu; Ueda, Norifumi; Matsukage, Shoichi; Nakanishi, Mamoru; Kito, Katsumi; Miyazaki, Tatsuhiko; Ohtsuki, Yuji; Oshiro, Yumi; Inoue, Hiromichi; Kawaguchi, Hidetoshi; Yamashita, Natsumi; Aogi, Kenjiro; Moriya, Takuya
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical pathology. Volume 68:Issue 5(2015)
• Page Start: 356
• Page End: 361
• Publication Date: 2015-02-11
• Subjects: BREAST CANCER -- BREAST PATHOLOGY -- TUMOUR BIOLOGY; Pathology -- Periodicals; Pathology, Molecular -- Periodicals; 616.0705
• DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202695
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9746

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: Personalised breast cancer therapy requires pathological characterisation of tumours. The proliferative index, based on Ki67, is pivotal, but a standard method has not been established. Here we look for an easy and practical way to evaluate Ki67. Methods: Immunohistochemical staining of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, HER2 and Ki67 (MIB-1) was performed on resected specimens from 406 primary invasive ductal carcinomas. Ki67 labelling index (LI) from manual counting was compared with visual assessment using a 5-grade scale (Eye-5). Next, 10 pathologists evaluated 100 samples with marked hot spots by using Eye-5. Another 100 samples without marking were also assessed by eight pathologists. One year later, two pathologists reviewed 222 cases with Eye-5. Prognosis was analysed among estrogen receptor-positive cases with postoperative endocrine therapy. Results: Eye-5 showed good correlation to LI. All 136 cases of score 4–5 had LI >20% and all 56 cases of score 1 had LI<20%, which means that manual counting was not necessary for about half of the cases. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was low even when a hot spot was not fixed. Eye-5 also correlated with histological grade and lymph node metastasis. Combining Eye-5 and histological grade created a new algorism to predict LI, which allows 80% of all cases (74% of luminal cases) without manual counting. Cases of Eye-5 score 1–2 had significantly better survival than score 3–5. Conclusions: Visual assessment of Ki67 by a 5-grade scale (Eye-5) is fast, easy, and reliable with acceptably low interobserver and intraobserver variability. Eye-5 can replace LI in many luminal tumours, and is a strong candidate as a standard method of evaluating Ki67.