Comparison between optical microscopy and automation for cytometric analysis of pericardial fluids in a cohort of adult subjects undergoing cardiac surgery. Issue 7 (29th April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison between optical microscopy and automation for cytometric analysis of pericardial fluids in a cohort of adult subjects undergoing cardiac surgery. Issue 7 (29th April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparison between optical microscopy and automation for cytometric analysis of pericardial fluids in a cohort of adult subjects undergoing cardiac surgery
- Authors:
- Buoro, Sabrina
Seghezzi, Michela
Baigorria Vaca, Maria del Carmen
Manenti, Barbara
Moioli, Valentina
Previtali, Giulia
Simon, Caterina
Cugola, Diego
Brucato, Antonio
Ottomano, Cosimo
Lippi, Giuseppe - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aims: Limited information is available on number and type of cells present in the pericardial fluid (PF). Current evidence and has been garnered with inaccurate application of guidelines for analysis of body fluids. This study was aimed at investigating the performance of automate cytometric analysis of PF in adult subjects. Methods: Seventy-four consecutive PF samples were analysed with Sysmex XN with a module for body fluid analysis (XN-BF) and optical microscopy (OM). The study also encompassed the assessment of limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation (LoQ), imprecision, carryover and linearity of XN-BF module. Results: XN-BF parameters were compared with OM for the following cell classes: total cells (TC), leucocytes (white blood cell [WBC]), polymorphonuclear (PMN) and mononuclear (MN) cells. The relative bias were −4.5%, 71.2%, 108.2% and −47.7%, respectively. Passing and Bablok regression yielded slope comprised between 0.06 for MN and 5.8 for PMN, and intercept between 0.7 for PMN and 220.3 for MN. LoQ was comprised between 3.8×10 6 and 6.0×10 6 cells/L for WBC and PMN. Linearity was acceptable and carryover negligible. Conclusions: PF has a specific cellular composition. Overall, automated cell counting can only be suggested for total number of cells, whereas OM seems still the most reliable option for cell differentiation.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical pathology. Volume 72:Issue 7(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical pathology
- Issue:
- Volume 72:Issue 7(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 72, Issue 7 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 72
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0072-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 493
- Page End:
- 500
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04-29
- Subjects:
- cell counting -- automation -- differentiation
Pathology -- Periodicals
Pathology, Molecular -- Periodicals
616.0705 - Journal URLs:
- http://jcp.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://jcp.bmjjournals.com/content/by/year ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=162&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-205788 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0021-9746
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18099.xml