Comparison of the safety and efficacy of the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol and the concomitant administration of dorzolamide and timolol: a clinical equivalence study. Issue 11 (1st November 1998)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hutzelmann, Jill; Owens, Susan; Shedden, Arthur; Adamsons, Ingrid; Vargas, Enrique
• Is Part Of: British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 82:Issue 11(1998)
• Page Start: 1249
• Page End: 1253
• Publication Date: 1998-11-01
• Subjects: dorzolamide -- timolol -- intraocular pressure -- glaucoma -- ocular hypertension; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.11.1249
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1161

Abstract

Abstract : AIMS: To compare the tolerability and efficacy of a fixed combination solution of dorzolamide/timolol (Cosopt), administered twice daily with the concomitant administration of its components, dorzolamide (Trusopt) twice daily and timolol (Timoptic) twice daily. METHODS: After a 2 week timolol run in, patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomised (1:1) to receive treatment with either the dorzolamide/timolol combination solution twice daily (combination) or the dorzolamide solution twice daily plus timolol maleate solution twice daily (concomitant) for 3 months. RESULTS: 299 patients were entered and 290 patients completed the study. Compared with the timolol baseline, additional IOP lowering of 16% was observed at trough (hour 0) and 22% at peak (hour 2) at month 3 in both the concomitant and combination groups. The IOP lowering effects of the two treatment groups were clinically and statistically equivalent as demonstrated by the extremely small point differences (concomitant − combination) observed in this study−0.01 mm Hg at trough and 0.08 mm Hg at peak. The safety variables of the concomitant and combination groups were very similar. Both combination and concomitant therapy were well tolerated and few patients discontinued due to adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The dorzolamide/timolol combination solution administered twice daily is equivalent in efficacy and has a similar safety profile to the concomitant administration of the components administered twice daily.