Assessment of thyroid cancer risk associated with radiation dose from personal diagnostic examinations in a cohort study of US radiologic technologists, followed 1983–2014. Issue 5 (14th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Little, Mark P; Lim, Hyeyeun; Friesen, Melissa C; Preston, Dale L; Doody, Michele M; Sigurdson, Alice J; Neta, Gila; Alexander, Bruce H; Chang, Lienard A; Cahoon, Elizabeth K; Simon, Steven L; Linet, Martha S; Kitahara, Cari M
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 5(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-05-14
• Subjects: cancer -- cancer epidemiology -- cohort studies -- epidemiological methods -- radiation; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021536
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To assess whether personal medical diagnostic procedures over life, but particularly those associated with exposure in adulthood, were associated with increased thyroid cancer risk. Design: Participants from the US Radiologic Technologists Study, a large, prospective cohort, were followed from the date of first mailed questionnaire survey completed during 1983–1989 to the earliest date of self-reported diagnosis of thyroid cancer or of any other cancer than non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in any of three subsequent questionnaires up to the last in 2012–2014. Setting: US nationwide, occupational cohort. Participants: US radiologic technologists with exclusion of: those who reported a previous cancer apart from NMSC on the first questionnaire; those who reported a cancer with an unknown date of diagnosis on any of the questionnaires; and those who did not respond to both the first questionnaire and at least one subsequent questionnaire. Primary outcome measure: We used Cox proportional hazards models with age as timescale to compute HRs and 95% CI for thyroid cancer in relation to cumulative 5-year lagged diagnostic thyroid dose. Results: There were 414 self-reported thyroid cancers (n=275 papillary) in a cohort of 76 415 persons. Cumulative thyroid dose was non-significantly positively associated with total (excess relative risk/Gy=2.29 (95% CI −0.91 to 7.01, p=0.19)) and papillary thyroid cancer (excess relative risk/Gy=4.15 (95% CI −0.39, 11.27, p=0.08)) risk. These associations were not modified by age at, or time since, exposure and were independent of occupational exposure. Conclusion: Our study provides weak evidence that thyroid dose from diagnostic radiation procedures over the whole of life, in particular associated with exposure in adulthood, influences adult thyroid cancer risk.