Reduced vision in older adults with age related macular degeneration interferes with ability to care for self and impairs role as carer. Issue 9 (17th August 2004)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stevenson, M R; Hart, P M; Montgomery, A-M; McCulloch, D W; Chakravarthy, U
• Is Part Of: British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 88:Issue 9(2004)
• Page Start: 1125
• Page End: 1130
• Publication Date: 2004-08-17
• Subjects: AMD, age related macular degeneration -- DVA, distance visual acuity; age related macular degeneration -- older adults -- quality of life -- self care -- visual impairment; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.032383
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1161

Abstract

Abstract : Aim: To study the relation between visual impairment and ability to care for oneself or a dependant in older people with age related macular degeneration (AMD). Method: Cross sectional study of older people with visual impairment due to AMD in a specialised retinal service clinic. 199 subjects who underwent visual function assessment (fully corrected distance and near acuity and contrast sensitivity in both eyes), followed by completion of a package of questionnaires dealing with general health status (SF36), visual functioning (Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision, DLTV) and ability to care for self or provide care to others. The outcome measure was self reported ability to care for self and others. Three levels of self reported ability to care were identified—inability to care for self (level 1), ability to care for self but not others (level 2), and ability to care for self and others (level 3). Results: People who reported good general health status and visual functioning (that is, had high scores on SF36 and DLTV) were more likely to state that they were able to care for self and others. Similarly people with good vision in the better seeing eye were more likely to report ability to care for self and others. People with a distance visual acuity (DVA) worse than 0.4 logMAR (Snellen 6/15) had less than 50% probability of assigning themselves to care level 3 and those with DVA worse than 1.0 logMAR (Snellen 6/60) had a probability of greater than 50% or for assigning themselves to care level 1. Regression analyses with level of care as the dependent variable and demographic factors, DLTV subscales, and SF36 dimensions as the explanatory variables confirmed that the DLTV subscale 1 was the most important variable in the transition from care level 3 to care level 2. The regression analyses also confirmed that the DLTV subscale 2 was the most important in the transition from care level 3 to care level 1. Conclusions: Ability to care for self and dependants has a strong relation with self reported visual functioning and quality of life and is adversely influenced by visual impairment. The acuity at which the balance of probability shifts in the direction of diminished ability to care for self or others is lower than the level set by social care agencies for provision of support. These findings have implications for those involved with visual rehabilitation and for studies of the cost effectiveness of interventions in AMD.