Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Issue 8 (11th July 2005)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lin, S-M; Lin, C-J; Lin, C-C; Hsu, C-W; Chen, Y-C
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 54:Issue 8(2005)
• Page Start: 1151
• Page End: 1156
• Publication Date: 2005-07-11
• Subjects: RFTA, radiofrequency thermal ablation -- PEI, percutaneous ethanol injection -- PAI, percutaneous acetic acid injection -- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma -- US, ultrasonography -- CT, computed tomography -- PTC, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram -- HBV, hepatitis B virus -- RR, risk ratio; hepatocellular carcinoma -- radiofrequency thermal ablation -- percutaneous ethanol injection -- percutaneous acetic acid injection -- local recurrence -- cancer free survival; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gut.2004.045203
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and methods: A total of 187 patients with HCCs of 3 cm or less were randomly assigned to RFTA (n = 62), PEI (n = 62), or PAI (n = 63). Tumour recurrence and survival rates were assessed. Results: One, two, and three year local recurrence rates were 10%, 14%, and 14% in the RFTA group, 16%, 34%, and 34% in the PEI group, and 14%, 31%, and 31% in the PAI group (RFTA v PEI, p = 0.012; RFTA v PAI, p = 0.017). One, two, and three year survival rates were 93%, 81%, and 74% in the RFTA group, 88%, 66%, and 51% in the PEI group, and 90%, 67%, and 53% in the PAI group (RFTA v PEI, p = 0.031; RFTA v PAI, p = 0.038). One, two, and three year cancer free survival rates were 74%, 60%, and 43% in the RFTA group, 70%, 41%, and 21% in the PEI group, and 71%, 43%, and 23% in the PAI group (RFTA v PEI, p = 0.038; RFTA v PAI, p = 0.041). Tumour size, tumour differentiation, and treatment methods (RFTA v PEI and PAI) were significant factors for local recurrence, overall survival, and cancer free survival. Major complications occurred in 4.8% of patients (two with haemothorax, one gastric perforation) in the RFTA group and in none in two other groups (RFTA v PEI and PAI, p = 0.035). Conclusions: RFTA was superior to PEI and PAI with respect to local recurrence, overall survival, and cancer free survival rates, but RFTA also caused more major complications.