Comments on an obstructed death -- a case conference revisited: commentary 1. Issue 2 (June 1990) - Byrne, Peter
Abstract : The paper comments on Scott Dunbar's "An obstructed death and medical ethics, " arguing contra Dunbar that we should not view truth-telling to the terminally ill as primarily governed by principles of veracity and respect for autonomy. All such rules are of limited value in medical ethics. We should instead turn to an ethics deriving from the centrality of moral relationships and virtues. A brief analysis of the connections between moral relationships and moral rules is offered. Such an ethics would lower the value that philosophical fashion places on truth-telling and autonomy and leave decisions about truth-telling and the terminally ill more dependent on the circumstances of particular cases.